To our benefit or at your expense? justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources

被引:12
作者
Otten S. [1 ,2 ]
Mummendey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena
[2] Department of Social Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
关键词
Distributive justice; Minimal group paradigm; Normative appropriateness; Positive-negative asymmetry; Social discrimination; Social identity theory;
D O I
10.1023/A:1023274223181
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Several studies consistently demonstrated a positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In line with classical minimal group experiments, laboratory groups favored their in-group when allocating positive resources or evaluating positive dimensions. However, they refrained from discriminating behavior as soon as negative resources had to be distributed between groups. We propose that this is due to valence-specific differences in the consideration and perception of social justice. Several studies tested whether social norms inhibiting in-group favoritism and out-group derogation are differently interpreted or weighed due to the valence of resources. Consequently, a survey of these studies is given and their implications for classical theories on intergroup behavior and future research on social discrimination are discussed. © 1999 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 38
页数:19
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Allport G.W., The Nature of Prejudice, (1954)
  • [2] Billig M., Tajfel H., Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, pp. 27-52, (1973)
  • [3] Blanz M., Mummendey A., Otten S., Positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination: The impact of stimulus-valence, size- And status-differentials in intergroup evaluations, British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, pp. 409-419, (1995)
  • [4] Blanz M., Mummendey A., Otten S., Wahrgenommene Motive für soziale Diskriminierung: Einflüsse von Stimuhisvalenz und Beurteilerperspektive. (Perceived motives for social discrimination: the influence of stimulus valence and observer perspective), Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 26, pp. 135-147, (1995)
  • [5] Blanz M., Mummendey A., Otten S., Normative evaluations and frequency expectations regarding positive and negative outcome allocations between groups, European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, pp. 165-176, (1997)
  • [6] Boucher J., Osgood C.E., The Pollyanna hypothesis, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 8, pp. 1-8, (1969)
  • [7] Brewer M.B., In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis, Psychological Bulletin, 86, pp. 307-324, (1979)
  • [8] Brown R.J., Social Psychology (2nd Ed.), (1986)
  • [9] Brown R.J., Group Processes: Dynamics Within and between Groups, (1988)
  • [10] Buhl T., Empirische Befunde Zur Valenzspezifischen Eigengruppenbevorzugung. Eine Meta-Analyse Zur Positiv-negativ Asymmetrie Sozialer Diskriminierung, (1996)