To our benefit or at your expense? justice considerations in intergroup allocations of positive and negative resources

被引：12

作者：

Otten S. ^{[1
,2
]}

Mummendey A. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena

[2] Department of Social Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena

来源：

Social Justice Research | 1999年 / 12卷 / 1期

关键词：

Distributive justice; Minimal group paradigm; Normative appropriateness; Positive-negative asymmetry; Social discrimination; Social identity theory;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1023274223181

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Several studies consistently demonstrated a positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination. In line with classical minimal group experiments, laboratory groups favored their in-group when allocating positive resources or evaluating positive dimensions. However, they refrained from discriminating behavior as soon as negative resources had to be distributed between groups. We propose that this is due to valence-specific differences in the consideration and perception of social justice. Several studies tested whether social norms inhibiting in-group favoritism and out-group derogation are differently interpreted or weighed due to the valence of resources. Consequently, a survey of these studies is given and their implications for classical theories on intergroup behavior and future research on social discrimination are discussed. © 1999 Plenum Publishing Corporation.

引用

页码：19 / 38

页数：19

共 61 条

[31] Mummendey A., Otten S., Positive-negative-asymmetry in social discrimination, European Review of Social Psychology, 9, pp. 107-143, (1998)
[32] Mummendey A., Otten S., Berger U., Positive-Negative Asymmetry in Intergroup Discrimination: Valence of Evaluation and Salience of Categorization, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, (1999)
[33] Mummendey A., Otten S., Blanz M., Social categorization and intergroup discrimination. the asymmetry in positive versus negative outcome allocations, Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 1, pp. 15-30, (1994)
[34] Mummendey A., Otten S., Blanz M., Positiv-negativ-Asymmetrien Sozialer Diskriminierung: Zum Einfluß von Stimulus-Valenz Auf Intergruppale Bewertungen und Aufteilungsentscheidungen, (1994)
[35] Mummendey A., Simon B., Diskriminierung von Fremdgruppen: Zur Asymmetrie im Umgang mit positiven und negativen Bewertungen und Ressourcen (Discrimination against outgroups: on the asymmetry in dealing with positive and negative evaluations and resources), Berichte Über Den 37. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1990, 2, pp. 359-365, (1991)
[36] Mummendey A., Simon B., Dietze C., Grunert M., Haeger G., Kessler S., Lettgen S., Schaferhoff S., Categorization is not enough: Intergroup discrimination in negative outcome allocation, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, pp. 125-144, (1992)
[37] Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A., Tenbrunsel A., Thomas M., Benefits and Burdens: Does it really matter what we allocate?, Social Justice Research, 9, pp. 27-45, (1996)
[38] Oakes P.J., Turner J.C., Haslam S.A., Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations, British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, pp. 125-144, (1991)
[39] Otten S., Mummendey A., Blanz M., Intergroup discrimination in positive and negative outcome allocations: The impact of stimulus valence, relative group status and relative group size, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, pp. 568-581, (1996)
[40] Otten S., Mummendey A., Buhl T., Accuracy in information processing and the positive-negative asymmetry in social discrimination, Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, (1999)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →