Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery

被引:86
作者
Jameson L.C. [1 ]
Sloan T.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado at Denver, Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262
关键词
Anesthesia; Electroencephalography; Monitoring;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-006-9044-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The use of processed electroencephalography (EEG) using a simple frontal lead system has been made available for assessing the impact of anesthetic medications during surgery. This review discusses the basic principles behind these devices. The foundations of anesthesia monitoring rest on the observations of Guedel with ether that the depth of anesthesia relates to the cortical, brainstem and spinal effects of the anesthetic agents. Anesthesiologists strive to have a patient who is immobile, is unconscious, is hemodynamically stable and who has no intraoperative awareness or recall. These anesthetic management principles apply today, despite the absence of ether from the available anesthetic medications. The use of the EEG as a supplement to the usual monitoring techniques rests on the observation that anesthetic medications all alter the synaptic function which produces the EEG. Frontal EEG can be viewed as a surrogate for the drug effects on the entire central nervous system (CNS). Using mathematical processing techniques, commercial EEG devices create an index usually between 0 and 100 to characterize this drug effect. Critical aspects of memory formation occur in the frontal lobes making EEG monitoring in this area a possible method to assess risk of recall. Integration of processed EEG monitoring into anesthetic management is evolving and its ability to characterize all of the anesthetic effects on the CNS (in particular awareness and recall) and improve decision making is under study. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 472
页数:27
相关论文
共 171 条
[1]  
Sebel P.S., Bowdle T.A., Ghoneim M.M., Rampil I.J., Padilla R.E., Gan T.J., Domino K.B., The incidence of awareness during anesthesia: A multicenter United States study, Anesth Analg, 99, pp. 833-839, (2004)
[2]  
Monk T.G., Saini V., Weldon B.C., Sigl J.C., Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery, Anesth Analg, 100, pp. 4-10, (2005)
[3]  
Guedel A., Inhalational Anesthesia. A Fundamental Guide, (1937)
[4]  
Eger II E.I., Saidman L.J., Brandstater B., Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration: A standard of anesthetic potency, Anesthesiology, 26, pp. 756-763, (1965)
[5]  
Chortkoff B.S., Eger II E.I., Crankshaw D.P., Gonsowski C.T., Dutton R.C., Ionescu P., Concentrations of desflurane and propofol that suppress response to command in humans, Anesth Analg, 81, pp. 737-743, (1995)
[6]  
Chortkoff B.S., Gonsowski C.T., Bennett H.L., Levinson B., Crankshaw D.P., Dutton R.C., Ionescu P., Block R.I., Eger II E.I., Subanesthetic concentrations of desflurane, propofol suppress recall of emotionally charged information, Anesth Analg, 81, pp. 728-736, (1995)
[7]  
Angel A., The G. L. Brown lecture. Adventures in anaesthesia, Exp Physiol, 76, pp. 1-38, (1991)
[8]  
Chernik D.A., Gillings D., Laine H., Hendler J., Silver J.M., Davidson A.B., Schwam E.M., Siegel J.L., Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/ Sedation Scale: Study with intravenous midazolam, J Clin Psychopharmacol, 10, pp. 244-251, (1990)
[9]  
Ting C.H., Angel A., Linkens D.A., Neuronal network modelling of the effects of anaesthetic agents on somatosensory pathways, Biol Cybernet, 88, pp. 99-107, (2003)
[10]  
Sinensky M., Pinkerton F., Sutherland E., Simon F.R., Rate limitation of (Na+ + K+)-stimulated adenosinetriphosphatase by membrane acyl chain ordering, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 76, pp. 4893-4897, (1979)