Bone disease in myeloma

被引:8
作者
Berenson J.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University of California, Los Angeles School of Medicine, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Los Angeles, 90048, CA
关键词
Bone Resorption; Multiple Myeloma; Myeloma; Pamidronate; Zoledronic Acid;
D O I
10.1007/s11864-001-0041-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The major clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma results from osteolytic bone destruction. The only currently Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the treatment of the bony complications of multiple myeloma is monthly intravenous pamidronate at a dose of 90 mg infused over 4 hours. Recent studies have shown the safety of 2-hour infusions. A randomized trial comparing pamidronate to placebo continued to show benefits throughout the 21-month trial. Although the duration of therapy has not been firmly determined, it is likely that discontinuation of this drug will be met by enhanced bone loss and an increased risk of bony complications for these patients. Thus, it is recommended that the drug be continued indefinitely. Support for this recommendation also comes from the reduced bone density observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis following the withdrawal of bisphosphonate treatment. Recent attempts to give higher doses, more frequent infusions (every 2 weeks or less), or more rapid infusions (1 hour or less) of pamidronate have occasionally been associated with albuminuria and azotemia. These modifications should therefore be avoided. Importantly, the drug can be safely administered at 90 mg monthly to patients with poor renal function. The use of pamidronate for myeloma patients without lytic bone involvement or with Durie-Salmon stages I or II disease has not been evaluated. However, it is recognized that most patients with earlier stages of disease or without lytic bone involvement also develop bony complications. There is no reason to believe that these patients would not benefit from monthly intravenous infusions of pamidronate. The potential antimyeloma effect of this agent is another reason to administer this drug in these types of patients. Thus, it is our practice to administer monthly pamidronate to myeloma patients regardless of stage or bone involvement. However, trials evaluating oral bisphosphonates have produced inconsistent clinical results, probably as a result of the erratic and scanty poor absorption as well as poor oral tolerability of these drugs. Although these oral agents may be useful in some patients, it is impossible to identify which myeloma patients will benefit from orally administered bisphosphonates. The more potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid more effectively reverses hypercalcemia of malignancy than pamidronate, and it appears promising in reducing bone loss in cancer patients. However, its efficacy in preventing skeletal complications is still being evaluated. Many other types of new agents are in early clinical trials, but their efficacy remains unproven at the present time. © 2001, Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 283
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
[61]  
Pearse R.N., Sordillo E.M., Yaccoby S., Et al., Administration of TRANCE-antagonist TR-Fc limits myeloma-induced bone destruction, Blood, 96, (2000)
[62]  
Iotsova V., Caamano J., Loy J., Et al., Osteopetrosis in mice lacking NF-kappaB1 and NF-kappaB2, Nat Med, 11, pp. 1285-1289, (1997)
[63]  
Andela V.B., Schwarz E.M., Puzas E., Et al., Tumor metastasis and the reciprocal regulation of prometastatic and antimetastatic factors by nuclear factor kB, Cancer Res, 60, pp. 6557-6562, (2000)
[64]  
Stinchcombe T.E., Mitchell B.S., Depcik-Smith N., Et al., PS-341 is active in multiple myeloma: preliminary report of a phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor PS-341 in patients with hematologic malignancies, Blood, 96, (2000)
[65]  
Mundy G., Garrett R., Harris S., Et al., Stimulation of bone formation in vitro and in rodents by statins, Science, 286, pp. 1946-1949, (1999)
[66]  
Service R.F., Tissue engineers build new bone, Science, 289, pp. 1498-1499, (2000)
[67]  
Engleman V.W., Nickols G.A., Ross F.P., Et al., A peptidomimetic antagonist of the avb3 integrin inhibits bone resorption in vitro and prevents osteoporosis in vivo, J Clin Invest, 99, pp. 2284-2292, (1997)
[68]  
Carron C.P., Myer D.M., Engleman V.W., Et al., Peptidomimetic antagonist of aVb3 inhibit bone resorption by inhibiting osteoclast bone resorptive activity, not osteoclast adhesion to bone, J Endocrinol, 165, pp. 587-598, (2000)
[69]  
Brooks P.C., Clark R.A., Cheresh D.A., Requirement of vascular integrin alpha v beta 3 for angiogenesis, Science, 264, (1994)
[70]  
Brooks P.C., Stromblad S., Klemke R., Et al., Antiintegrin alpha v beta 3 blocks human breast cancer growth and angiogenesis in human skin, J Clin Invest, 96, (1995)