Effects of addition of policosanol to omega-3 fatty acid therapy on the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia

被引:22
作者
Castaño G. [1 ]
Ferńandez L. [1 ]
Mas R. [1 ,2 ]
Illnait J. [1 ]
Gámez R. [1 ]
Mendoza S. [1 ]
Mesa M. [1 ]
Fernández J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Surgical Medical Research Center, Center of Natural Products, National Center of Scientific Research, Havana City
[2] Center of Natural Products, National Center for Scientific Research (CNIC), Havana City, 6990 or 6880, Playa, PO Box
关键词
Total Cholesterol; Lipid Profile; Atorvastatin; Combine Therapy; Primary Efficacy Variable;
D O I
10.2165/00126839-200506040-00003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Policosanol is a mixture of higher aliphatic primary alcohols purified from sugarcane wax. The mixture has cholesterol-lowering efficacy, its specific effects being to reduce serum total (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The effects of policosanol on triglycerides (TG) are modest and inconsistent. Omega-3 fatty acids (FA) from fish oil protect against coronary disease, mainly through antiarrhythmic and antiplatelet effects. Omega-3 FA also have lipid-modifying effects, mostly relating to TG reduction. Thus, potential benefits could be expected from combined therapy with omega-3 FA and policosanol. Objective: To investigate whether combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol offers benefits compared with omega-3 FA + placebo with respect to the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. Methods: This randomised, double-blind study was conducted in 90 patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. After 5 weeks on a cholesterol-lowering diet, patients were randomised to omega-3 FA + placebo, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day or omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. Omega-3 FA was supplied as 1g capsules (two per day); placebo and policosanol were provided in tablet form. Physical signs and laboratory markers were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks on therapy. Drug compliance and adverse experiences (AEs) were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. The primary efficacy variable was LDL-C reduction; other lipid profile markers were secondary variables. Results: After 8 weeks, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 and 10 mg/day, but not omega-3 FA + placebo, significantly reduced LDL-C by 21.1% and 24.4%, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day also significantly lowered TC (12.7%; p < 0.01) and TG (13.6%; p < 0.05), and significantly increased HDL-C (+14.4%; p < 0.001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day significantly decreased TC (15.3%; p < 0.001) and TG (14.7%; p < 0.01), and significantly increased HDL-C (+15.5%; p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + placebo significantly reduced TG (14.2%; p < 0.05) but had no significant effect on other lipid profile variables. The proportion of randomised patients in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day groups that achieved LDL-C targets or reductions =15% was significantly greater than in the omega-3 FA + placebo group (p < 0.001). Combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/ day resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C, TC and HDL-C than treatment with omega-3 FA + placebo, but did not modify the TG response compared with the omega-3 FA + placebo group. Four patients (two in the omega-3 FA + placebo group and two in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day group) withdrew from the study; none of these withdrawals was due to AEs. Two patients reported mild AEs, namely nausea/ headache (one in the omega-3 FA + placebo group) and heartburn (one in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day group). Conclusions: Policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day administered concomitantly with omega-3 FA 1 g/day improved LDL-C, TC and HDL-C, maintained the reduction in TG attributable to omega-3 FA monotherapy, and was well tolerated. Treatment with omega-3 FA + policosanol could be useful for regulating lipid profile in patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia, but further studies involving larger sample sizes are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. © 2005 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] The Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Primary Prevention Trial results. I. Reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease, JAMA, 251, pp. 351-364, (1984)
  • [2] The lipid research clinics coronary primary prevention trial results. II. The relationship of reduction in the incidence of coronary heart disease to cholesterol-lowering, JAMA, 251, pp. 365-374, (1984)
  • [3] Frick M.H., Elo O., Happa K., Helsinki Heart Study: Primary-prevention with gemfibrozil in middle-aged men with dyslipidemia, N Engl J Med, 317, pp. 1237-1245, (1987)
  • [4] Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S), Lancet, 344, pp. 1383-1389, (1994)
  • [5] Sacks F.M., Pfeffer M.A., Moye L.A., Et al., The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels, N Engl J Med, 335, pp. 1001-1009, (1996)
  • [6] Prevention of cardiovascular events and deaths with pravastatin in patients with coronary heart disease and a broad range of initial cholesterol levels, N Engl J Med, 339, pp. 1349-1357, (1998)
  • [7] Shepherd S., Cobbe S.M., Ford I., Et al., Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia, N Engl J Med, 333, pp. 1301-1307, (1995)
  • [8] Downs J.R., Clearfield M., Weiss S., Et al., Primary prevention of acute coronary events with lovastatin in men and women with average cholesterol levels: Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS, JAMA, 279, pp. 1615-1622, (1998)
  • [9] MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20,536 high-risk individuals: A randomized placebo-controlled trial, Lancet, 360, pp. 7-22, (2002)
  • [10] Shepherd J., Blauw G.J., Murphy M.B., Et al., Pravastatin in elderly individuals at risk of vascular disease (PROSPER): A randomized controlled study, Lancet, 360, pp. 1623-1630, (2002)