Effects of addition of policosanol to omega-3 fatty acid therapy on the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia

被引:22
作者
Castaño G. [1 ]
Ferńandez L. [1 ]
Mas R. [1 ,2 ]
Illnait J. [1 ]
Gámez R. [1 ]
Mendoza S. [1 ]
Mesa M. [1 ]
Fernández J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Surgical Medical Research Center, Center of Natural Products, National Center of Scientific Research, Havana City
[2] Center of Natural Products, National Center for Scientific Research (CNIC), Havana City, 6990 or 6880, Playa, PO Box
关键词
Total Cholesterol; Lipid Profile; Atorvastatin; Combine Therapy; Primary Efficacy Variable;
D O I
10.2165/00126839-200506040-00003
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Policosanol is a mixture of higher aliphatic primary alcohols purified from sugarcane wax. The mixture has cholesterol-lowering efficacy, its specific effects being to reduce serum total (TC) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and to increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). The effects of policosanol on triglycerides (TG) are modest and inconsistent. Omega-3 fatty acids (FA) from fish oil protect against coronary disease, mainly through antiarrhythmic and antiplatelet effects. Omega-3 FA also have lipid-modifying effects, mostly relating to TG reduction. Thus, potential benefits could be expected from combined therapy with omega-3 FA and policosanol. Objective: To investigate whether combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol offers benefits compared with omega-3 FA + placebo with respect to the lipid profile of patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. Methods: This randomised, double-blind study was conducted in 90 patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia. After 5 weeks on a cholesterol-lowering diet, patients were randomised to omega-3 FA + placebo, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day or omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day for 8 weeks. Omega-3 FA was supplied as 1g capsules (two per day); placebo and policosanol were provided in tablet form. Physical signs and laboratory markers were assessed at baseline and after 4 and 8 weeks on therapy. Drug compliance and adverse experiences (AEs) were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. The primary efficacy variable was LDL-C reduction; other lipid profile markers were secondary variables. Results: After 8 weeks, omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 and 10 mg/day, but not omega-3 FA + placebo, significantly reduced LDL-C by 21.1% and 24.4%, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day also significantly lowered TC (12.7%; p < 0.01) and TG (13.6%; p < 0.05), and significantly increased HDL-C (+14.4%; p < 0.001). Omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day significantly decreased TC (15.3%; p < 0.001) and TG (14.7%; p < 0.01), and significantly increased HDL-C (+15.5%; p < 0.0001). Omega-3 FA + placebo significantly reduced TG (14.2%; p < 0.05) but had no significant effect on other lipid profile variables. The proportion of randomised patients in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day groups that achieved LDL-C targets or reductions =15% was significantly greater than in the omega-3 FA + placebo group (p < 0.001). Combined therapy with omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 or 10 mg/ day resulted in significantly greater changes in LDL-C, TC and HDL-C than treatment with omega-3 FA + placebo, but did not modify the TG response compared with the omega-3 FA + placebo group. Four patients (two in the omega-3 FA + placebo group and two in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 10 mg/day group) withdrew from the study; none of these withdrawals was due to AEs. Two patients reported mild AEs, namely nausea/ headache (one in the omega-3 FA + placebo group) and heartburn (one in the omega-3 FA + policosanol 5 mg/day group). Conclusions: Policosanol 5 or 10 mg/day administered concomitantly with omega-3 FA 1 g/day improved LDL-C, TC and HDL-C, maintained the reduction in TG attributable to omega-3 FA monotherapy, and was well tolerated. Treatment with omega-3 FA + policosanol could be useful for regulating lipid profile in patients with type II hypercholesterolaemia, but further studies involving larger sample sizes are needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. © 2005 Adis Data Information BV. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 219
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]  
Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III), JAMA, 285, pp. 2486-2497, (2001)
[12]  
Gotto A.M., Assman G., Carmena R., Et al., The ILIB Lipid Hand-book for Clinical Practice. Blood Lipids and Coronary Heart Disease. 2nd Ed., (2000)
[13]  
Mas R., Policosanol, Drugs of the Future, 25, pp. 569-586, (2000)
[14]  
Ortensi G., Gladstein H., Valli H., Et al., A comparative study of policosanol versus simvastatin in elderly patients with hypercholesterolemia, Curr Ther Res, 58, pp. 390-401, (1997)
[15]  
Mas R., Castano G., Illnait J., Et al., Effects of policosanol in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia and additional coronary risk factors, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 65, pp. 439-447, (1998)
[16]  
Castano G., Mas R., Arruzazabala M.L., Et al., Effects of policosanol, pravastatin on lipid profile, platelet aggregation, endothelemia in older hypercholesterolemic patients, Int J Clin Pharmacol Res, 19, pp. 105-116, (1999)
[17]  
Castano G., Mas R., Fernandez L., Et al., Effect of policosanol on postmenopausal women with type II hypercholesterolemia, Gynecol Endocrinol, 13, pp. 187-195, (2000)
[18]  
Mas R., Castano G., Fernandez L., Et al., Effects of policosanol in older hypercholesterolemic patients with coronary disease, Clin Drug Invest, 21, pp. 485-497, (2001)
[19]  
Castano G., Mas R., Fernandez L., Et al., Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of policosanol versus atorvastatin in elderly patients with type II hypercholesterolemia, Drugs Aging, 20, pp. 153-163, (2003)
[20]  
Torres O., Agramonte A.J., Illnait J., Et al., Treatment of hypercholesterolemia in NIDDM with policosanol, Diabetes Care, 18, pp. 393-397, (1995)