Algorithmic Accountability and Public Reason

被引：135

作者：

Binns R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford

来源：

Philosophy & Technology | 2018年 / 31卷 / 4期

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Algorithmic accountability; Discrimination; Public reason;

D O I：

10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The ever-increasing application of algorithms to decision-making in a range of social contexts has prompted demands for algorithmic accountability. Accountable decision-makers must provide their decision-subjects with justifications for their automated system’s outputs, but what kinds of broader principles should we expect such justifications to appeal to? Drawing from political philosophy, I present an account of algorithmic accountability in terms of the democratic ideal of ‘public reason’. I argue that situating demands for algorithmic accountability within this justificatory framework enables us to better articulate their purpose and assess the adequacy of efforts toward them. © 2017, The Author(s).

引用

页码：543 / 556

页数：13

共 60 条

[41]

Pedreschi D., Ruggieri S., Turini F., Measuring Discrimination in Socially-Sensitive Decision Records, Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 581-592, (2009)

[42]

Pietsch W., The causal nature of modeling with big data, Philosophy & Technology, 29, 2, pp. 137-171, (2016)

[43]

Quong J., Public Reason, (2013)

[44]

Rawls J., Political liberalism (with a new introduction and the “reply to Habermas”), New York, Columbia University Press, 1, 5, (1996)

[45]

Rawls J., The idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, University of Chicago. Law School, 64, 3, pp. 765-807, (1997)

[46]

Raz J., Disagreement in politics, The American Journal of Jurisprudence, 43, (1998)

[47]

Ribeiro M.T.S., Singh Guestrin C., Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learning, (2016)

[48]

Russel S., Norvig P., Artificial Intelligence: a Modern Approach, (2010)

[49]

Sandvig C., Seeing the Sort: The Aesthetic and Industrial Defense of ‘the Algorithm, Journal of the New Media Caucus|, (2015)

[50]

Sandvig C., Hamilton K., Karahalios K., Langbort C., Auditing Algorithms: Research Methods for Detecting Discrimination on Internet Platforms, Data and Discrimination: Converting Critical Concerns into Productive Inquiry, (2014)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →