Hernia repair with porcine small-intestinal submucosa

被引:58
作者
Ansaloni L. [1 ]
Catena F. [1 ]
Gagliardi S. [1 ]
Gazzotti F. [1 ]
D'Alessandro L. [1 ]
Pinna A.D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Unit of General, Transplant and Emergency Surgery, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, 40138 Bologna
关键词
Epitope galactosyl-α(1,3)galactose; Extracellular matrix; Hernioplasty; Tissue engineering; Xenograft;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-007-0225-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Although at present nonabsorbable meshes are the preferred material for tension-free hernioplasty, some problems with their use have yet to be addressed (i.e., chronic pain and infections). In order to address these disadvantages, a collagen-based material, the porcine small-intestinal submucosa mesh (Surgisis Inguinal Hernia Matrix, Cook Surgical, Bloomington, IN, USA), has recently been developed for hernia repair. Methods: With the aim of investigating the clinical safety and effectiveness of Surgisis IHM inguinal hernia repair, we report our experience of 45 consecutive hernioplasties with a medium-term follow-up. The surgical technique for the use of this material in hernioplasty is described in detail. Results: Although some local (i.e., seromas) and general (i.e., hyperpyrexia), complications appeared in the immediate postoperative period (all of them disappeared spontaneously), no rejection or infection was observed after operations. At the 2-year follow-up, a low degree of pain and discomfort and no recurrences were observed. Conclusions: We conclude that the Surgisis IHM hernioplasty is feasible with promising results and, from a clinical perspective, seems safe and effective. © Springer-Verlag 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 326
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Sachs M., Damm M., Encke A., Historical evolution of inguinal hernia repair, World J Surg, 21, pp. 218-223, (1997)
[2]  
Wantz G.E., Abdominal wall hernias, Principles of Surgery, (1999)
[3]  
Lichtenstein I.L., Shulman A.G., Amid P.K., Montllor M.M., The tension-free hernioplasty, Am J Surg, 157, pp. 188-193, (1989)
[4]  
Shulman A.G., Amid P.K., Lichtenstein I.L., The safety of mesh repair for primary inguinal hernias: Results of 3,019 operations from five diverse surgical sources, Am Surg, 58, pp. 255-257, (1992)
[5]  
Janu P.G., Sellers K.D., Mangiante E.C., Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: A ten-year review, Am Surg, 63, pp. 1065-1069, (1997)
[6]  
McGillicuddy J.E., Prospective randomized comparison of the Shouldice and Lichtenstein hernia repair procedures, Arch Surg, 133, pp. 974-978, (1998)
[7]  
Prior M.J., Williams E.V., Shukla H.S., Phillips S., Vig S., Lewis M., Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing Lichtenstein with modified Bassini repair of inguinal hernia, J R Coll Surg Edinb, 43, pp. 82-86, (1998)
[8]  
Collaboration E.H., Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, Br J Surg, 87, pp. 854-859, (2000)
[9]  
Heise C.P., Starling J.R., Mesh inguinodynia: A new clinical syndrome after inguinal herniorrhaphy?, J Am Coll Surg, 187, pp. 514-518, (1998)
[10]  
Taylor S.G., O'Dwyer P.J., Chronic groin sepsis following tension-free inguinal hernioplasty, Br J Surg, 86, pp. 562-565, (1999)