Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women.

被引:120
作者
Boyd N.R. [1 ]
Windsor R.A. [1 ]
Perkins L.L. [1 ]
Lowe J.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
关键词
Measurement; evaluation; saliva cotinine; pregnant women; smoking cessation;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022936705438
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this paper were to determine the rate of misclassification of smoking and nonsmoking status by self-reports and saliva continine of pregnant women participating in a smoking cessation trial, determine the relationship of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and saliva continine, and examine whether misclassification was due to an inappropriate saliva continine cutoff point. METHODS: End of pregnancy self-reports of smoking status and saliva continine were used to calculate misclassification rates. RESULTS: The findings revealed that 61 of 441 self-reported smokers had biochemical values inconsistent with smoking status for a smoking misclassification rate of 13.8%. The results also revealed that 28 of 107 self-reported quitters had continine values consistent with smoking status for a nonsmoking misclassification rate of 26.2%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were then plotted to determine whether misclassification resulted from an inappropriate cutoff point. The continine cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity for all women was 24 ng/ml. Racial ROC comparisons indicated a higher cutoff point for blacks than whites. Use of any of the ROC indicated cutoff points would not change the misclassification rates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that underreporting of smoking status during pregnancy is high and that social desirability of nonsmoking status may have contributed to the lack of precision in saliva continine to distinguish smoking status in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Simpson WJ(1957)A preliminary report on cigarette smoking and the incidence of prematurity Am J Obstet Gynecol 73 808-15
[2]  
Macmahon B(1966)Infant weight and parental smoking habits Am J Epidemiol 82 247-61
[3]  
Alpert B(1972)Cigarette smoking in pregnancy: Its influence on birth weight and prenatal mortality Br Med J 2 127-30
[4]  
Salver E(1993)The impact of infant birth weight and gestational age of cotinine-validated smoking reduction during pregnancy JAMA 269 1519-24
[5]  
Butler N(1995)Integrating smoking cessation into routine public health prenatal care: The smoking cessation in pregnancy project Am J Public Health 85 217-22
[6]  
Goldstein H(1986)Guidelines and methodological standards for smoking cessation intervention research among pregnant women: Improving the science and art Health Educ Q 13 131-61
[7]  
Ross E(1989)A randomized trial of a serialized self-help smoking cessation program for pregnant women in an HMO Am J Public Health 79 182-7
[8]  
Li CQ(1991)Stopping smoking in pregnancy: Effect of a self-help manual in a controlled trial Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98 260-4
[9]  
Windsor RA(1991)Cotinine-assisted intervention in pregnancy to reduce smoking and low-birthweight delivery Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98 859-65
[10]  
Perkins L(1993)Behavioral impact and cost benefit of health education methods for pregnant smokers in public health maternity clinics: The Birmingham Trail II Am J Public Health 83 201-6