Quality of measurement of smoking status by self-report and saliva cotinine among pregnant women.

被引:120
作者
Boyd N.R. [1 ]
Windsor R.A. [1 ]
Perkins L.L. [1 ]
Lowe J.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
关键词
Measurement; evaluation; saliva cotinine; pregnant women; smoking cessation;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022936705438
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this paper were to determine the rate of misclassification of smoking and nonsmoking status by self-reports and saliva continine of pregnant women participating in a smoking cessation trial, determine the relationship of the number of cigarettes smoked per day and saliva continine, and examine whether misclassification was due to an inappropriate saliva continine cutoff point. METHODS: End of pregnancy self-reports of smoking status and saliva continine were used to calculate misclassification rates. RESULTS: The findings revealed that 61 of 441 self-reported smokers had biochemical values inconsistent with smoking status for a smoking misclassification rate of 13.8%. The results also revealed that 28 of 107 self-reported quitters had continine values consistent with smoking status for a nonsmoking misclassification rate of 26.2%. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were then plotted to determine whether misclassification resulted from an inappropriate cutoff point. The continine cutoff point that maximized sensitivity and specificity for all women was 24 ng/ml. Racial ROC comparisons indicated a higher cutoff point for blacks than whites. Use of any of the ROC indicated cutoff points would not change the misclassification rates. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that underreporting of smoking status during pregnancy is high and that social desirability of nonsmoking status may have contributed to the lack of precision in saliva continine to distinguish smoking status in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 83
页数:6
相关论文
共 100 条
[11]  
Goldenberg RL(1989)Relative sensitivity and specificity of salivary and serum cotinine in identifying tobacco-smoking status of self-reported nonsmokers and smokers of tobacco and/or marijuana Arch Environ Health 44 53-8
[12]  
Lowe JB(1973)Nicotine and its metabolites: Radioimmunoassays for nicotine and cotinine Biochemistry 12 5025-30
[13]  
Kendrick JC(1983)Validation of self-reported smoking behavior: Biochemical analyses of cotinine and thiocyanate Am J Public Health 73 1204-7
[14]  
Zahniser C(1987)Lung cancer and passive smoking: Association an artefact due to misclassification of smoking habits? Toxicol Lett 35 157-62
[15]  
Miller N(1990)A review of the use of saliva cotinine as a marker of tobacco smoke exposure Prev Med 19 190-7
[16]  
Salas N(1978)Basic principles of ROC analysis Semin Nucl Med 8 283-98
[17]  
Stine J(1993)Saliva cotinine and recent smoking: Evidence for a nonlinear relationship Public Heal Rep 108 779-783
[18]  
Garguillo PM(1987)Cotinine validation of self-reported smoking in commercially run community surveys J Chron Dis 40 689-95
[19]  
Floyd RL(1987)Comparison of tests used to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers Am J Public Health 77 1435-8
[20]  
Spierto FW(1987)Saliva cotinine as a measure of smoking status in field settings Am J Public Health 77 846-8