Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture

被引:14
作者
John Sweller
机构
[1] University of New South Wales,School of Education
来源
Instructional Science | 2004年 / 32卷
关键词
Natural Selection; Small Variation; Genetic Information; Cognitive Load; Design Principle;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evolution by natural selection may becharacterized as a system in which a largestore of genetic information will persistindefinitely while it remains coordinated withits environment but will continuously producesmall random variations that are tested forenvironmental effectiveness. In anyenvironment, effective variations will persistwhile ineffective variations will disappear.Similarly, human cognitive architectureincludes a large store of information held inlong-term memory that coordinates our cognitiveactivities. A very limited working memory teststhe effectiveness of small variations tolong-term memory with effective variationsaltering long-term memory while ineffectivevariations are lost. Both an existing geneticcode and information in long-term memoryprovide a central executive that guidesbehaviour. Such a central executive isunavailable when an environment alters or whenworking memory must be used to deal with novelinformation. A major function of instructionaldesign is to provide the otherwise missingstructure of a central executive when dealingwith novel information and to reduce thatstructural support as knowledge accumulates inlong-term memory. Cognitive load theory bothprovides instructional design principles thatwould be difficult to devise without itsparticular view of human cognitive architectureand throws further light on that architecture.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 31
页数:22
相关论文
共 175 条
[31]  
Chandler P.(1996)When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons Journal of Educational Psychology 88 64-73
[32]  
Sweller J.(2001)Cognitive contraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding Journal of Educational Psychology 93 187-198
[33]  
Craig S.(1998)A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual-processing systems in working memory Journal of Educational Psychology 90 312-320
[34]  
Gholson B.(1996)Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, Background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text Cognition and Instruction 14 1-43
[35]  
Driscoll D.(1956)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information Psychological Review 63 81-97
[36]  
Egan D.E.(1999)Goals and learning in microworlds Cognitive Science 23 305-336
[37]  
Schwartz B.J.(1999)Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity Journal of Educational Psychology 91 358-368
[38]  
Ericsson K.A.(1995)Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes Journal of Educational Psychology 87 319-334
[39]  
Kintsch W.(1998)Learning to solve compare word problems: The effect of example format and generating self-explanations Cognition and Instruction 16 173-199
[40]  
Geddes B.(1985)What do students learn while solving mathematics problems? Journal of Educational Psychology 77 272-284