Home blood pressure teletransmission for better diagnosis and treatment

被引：29

作者：

Pickering T.G. ^{[1
]}

Gerin W. ^{[1
]}

Holland J.K. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Hypertension Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Cornell University, New York

[2] LifeLink Monitoring, Inc., PO Box 152, Bearsville, NY

来源：

Current Hypertension Reports | 1999年 / 1卷 / 6期

关键词：

Blood Pressure Control; Ambulatory Blood Pressure; Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring; Blood Pressure Reading; Veteran Administration;

D O I：

10.1007/s11906-996-0020-0

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The rate of control of high blood pressure is disappointing, and noncompliance is one factor that contributes to this. The reasons for poor compliance are complex and include factors related to the patient, the healthcare provider, and the medical system. In general, the lack of regula communication between the patient and the physician, as occurs in the traditional model of clinic-based care, predicts a low rate of blood pressure control. In addition clinic-based blood pressure rates are notoriously unreliable. A solution to this dilemma is teletransmission of self-measured blood pressure readings, which offers the dual advantages of more reliable measurements, and the establishment of regular telephone communication between the patient and the healthcare provider. Preliminary evidence with this type of system suggests that blood pressure control can be improved substantially. Copyright © 1999 by Current Science Inc.

引用

页码：489 / 494

页数：5

共 37 条

[11]

Myers, M.G., Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: Guidelines for use in clinical practice (1996) Can J Cardiol, 12, pp. 1271-1275

[12]

Mancia, G., Zanchetti, A., Agabiti-Rosei, E., Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy: Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation (SAMPLE) (1997) Circulation, 95, pp. 1464-1470

[13]

Porchet, M., Bussien, J.P., Waeber, B., Unpredictability of blood pressures recorded outside the clinic in the treated hypertensive patient (1986) J Cardiovasc Pharmacol, 8, pp. 332-335

[14]

Staessen, J.A., Byttebier, G., Buntinx, F., Antihypertensive treatment based on conventional or ambulatory blood pressure measurement: A randomized controlled trial. Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring and Treatment of Hypertension Investigators (1997) JAMA, 278, pp. 1065-1072

[15]

Stahl, S.M., Kelley, C.R., Neill, P.J., Effects of home blood pressure measurement on long-term BP control (1984) Am J Public Health, 74, pp. 704-709

[16]

Vrijens, B., Goetghebeur, E., Comparing compliance patterns between randomized treatments (1997) Control Clin Trials, 18, pp. 187-203

[17]

Edmonds, D., Foerster, E., Groth, H., Does self-measurement of blood pressure improve patient compliance in hypertension? (1985) J Hypertens, 3 (SUPPL.), pp. S31-S34

[18]

Ibrahim, M.M., Tarazi, R.C., Dustan, H.P., Gifford, R.W.J., Electrocardiogram in evaluation of resistance to antihypertensive therapy (1977) Arch Intern Med, 137, pp. 1125-1129

[19]

Kleinert, H.D., Harshfield, G.A., Pickering, T.G., What is the value of home blood pressure measurement in patients with mild hypertension? (1984) Hypertension, 6, pp. 574-578

[20]

Verdecchia, P., Bentivoglia, M., Providenza, M., Reliability of home self-recorded arterial pressure in essential hypertension in relation to the stage of the disease (1985) Blood Pressure Recording in the Clinical Management of Hypertension, pp. 40-42. , Edited by Germano G. Rome: Ediziono Pozzi

← 1 2 3 4 →