Argument in Artificial Intelligence and Law

被引：30

作者：

Bench-Capon T. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX

来源：

Artificial Intelligence and Law | 1997年 / 5卷 / 4期

关键词：

AI and law; Argument; Dialogue games; Explanation; Non-monotonic reasoning;

D O I：

10.1023/A:1008242417011

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

In this paper I shall discuss the notion of argument, and the importance of argument in AI and Law. I shall distinguish four areas where argument has been applied: in modelling legal reasoning based on cases; in the presentation and explanation of results from a rule based legal information system; in the resolution of normative conflict and problems of non-monotonicity; and as a basis for dialogue games to support the modelling of the process of argument. The study of argument is held to offer prospects of real progress in the field of AI and law, and the purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of work, and the connection between the various strands.

引用

页码：249 / 261

页数：12

共 28 条

[11]

Gordon T.F., The Pleadings Game - Formalising Procedural Justice, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 10-19, (1993)

[12]

Hage J.C., Teleological Reasoning in Reason Based Logic, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 11-20, (1995)

[13]

Hage J.C., Leenes R., Lodder A.R., Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2, 2, pp. 113-167, (1993)

[14]

Lodder A.R., Herezog A., DIALAW: A Dialogical Framework for Modelling Legal Reasoning, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 11-20, (1995)

[15]

Lutomski L.S., The Design of an Attorney's Statistical Consultant, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 224-233, (1989)

[16]

McCarthy J., Circumscription - A Form of Non-Monotonic Reasoning, Artificial Intelligence, 13, pp. 27-39, (1980)

[17]

McCarty L.T., An Implementation of Eisner v Macomber, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 276-286, (1995)

[18]

Marshall C.C., Representing the Structure of a Legal Argument, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 121-127, (1989)

[19]

Prakken H., Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument, (1993)

[20]

Prakken H., From Logic to Dialectics in Legal Argument, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on AI and Law, pp. 165-174, (1995)

← 1 2 3 →