The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (SAMR) Model: a Critical Review and Suggestions for its Use

被引：185

作者：

Hamilton E.R. ^{[1
]}

Rosenberg J.M. ^{[2
]}

Akcaoglu M. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Leadership and Learning, College of Education, Grand Valley State University, 476C DeVos, 401 Fulton W., Grand Rapids, 49504, MI

[2] Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education, Michigan State University, 620 Farm Lane, Room 447, East Lansing, 48824, MI

[3] Department of Leadership, Technology, and Human Development, College of Education, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, 30458, GA

来源：

TechTrends | 2016年 / 60卷 / 5期

关键词：

k-12; technology; SAMR; School technology implementation; Technology integration;

D O I：

10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition (SAMR) model is a four-level, taxonomy-based approach for selecting, using, and evaluating technology in K-12 settings (Puentedura 2006). Despite its increasing popularity among practitioners, the SAMR model is not currently represented in the extant literature. To focus the ongoing conversation regarding K-12 educators’ understanding and implementation of technology, we provide a critical review of the SAMR model using theory and prior research. We focus on the absence of context, its hierarchical structure, and the emphasis placed on product over process and conclude with suggestions to guide educators’ and researchers’ technology integration efforts. © 2016, Association for Educational Communications & Technology.

引用

页码：433 / 441

页数：8

共 53 条

[11]

Ertmer P.A., Teacher pedagogical beliefs: the final frontier in our quest for technology integration?, Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 4, pp. 25-39, (2005)

[12]

Ertmer P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich A.T., Sadik O., Sendurur E., Sendurur P., Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: a critical relationship, Computers & Education, 59, pp. 423-435, (2012)

[13]

Garrison D.R., Anderson T., Archer W., Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education, The Internet and Higher Education, 2, pp. 87-105, (1999)

[14]

Hamblen K.A., An art criticism questioning strategy within the framework of Bloom’s taxonomy, Studies in Art Education, 26, pp. 41-50, (1984)

[15]

Hennessey S., Ruthven K., Brindley S., Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution, and change, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 2, pp. 155-192, (2005)

[16]

Higgins E.L., Raskind M.H., The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II® on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities, Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 1, pp. 31-40, (2005)

[17]

Hmelo-Silver C.E., Azevedo R., Understanding complex systems: some core challenges, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, pp. 53-61, (2006)

[18]

Hooker C., SAMR swimming lessons, Retrieved from, (2014)

[19]

Hughes J., The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, pp. 277-302, (2005)

[20]

Inserra A., Short T., An analysis of high school math, science, social studies, English, and foreign language teachers’ implementation of one-to-one computing and their pedagogical practices, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41, pp. 145-169, (2012)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →