Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: A French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer

被引:79
作者
Roberge C. [1 ]
Tran M. [2 ]
Massoud C. [2 ]
Poirée B. [2 ]
Duval N. [2 ]
Damecour E. [2 ]
Frout D. [3 ]
Malvy D. [4 ]
Joly F. [1 ]
Lebailly P. [1 ]
Henry-Amar M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Service de Recherche Clinique, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen Cedex 5, Route de Lion-sur-Mer
[2] Service Diététique, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen Cedex 5, Route de Lion-sur-Mer
[3] Service de Chirurgie ORL, Centre François Baclesse, 14076 Caen Cedex 5, Route de Lion-sur-Mer
[4] Institut de Santé Publique, Ctr. René Labusquière, Bordeaux
关键词
Cancer; Home enteral tube feeding; Prospective study; Quality of life; Tolerance;
D O I
10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre Francois Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H and N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P < 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. One third of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 269
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]  
Guyatt G., Feeny D.H., Patrick D., Measuring health-related quality of life, Ann Intern Med, 118, pp. 622-629, (1995)
[22]  
Holden C.E., Puntis J.W., Charlton C.P., Booth I.W., Nasogastric feeding at home: Acceptability and safety, Arch Dis Child, 66, pp. 148-151, (1991)
[23]  
Howard L., Home parenteral and enteral nutrition in cancer patients, Cancer, 72, SUPPL. 2, pp. 3531-3541, (1993)
[24]  
Howard L., Ament L., Fleming C.R., Shike M., Steiger E., Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States, Gastroenterology, 109, pp. 355-365, (1995)
[25]  
Launois R., La prise en compte des préférences des patients dans les choix de santé individuels et collectifs, Rev Epidémiol Santé Publ, 42, pp. 246-262, (1994)
[26]  
Lees J., Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: A two year study, Eur J Cancer Care Engl, 6, pp. 45-49, (1997)
[27]  
Lipman T.O., Clinical trials of nutritional support in cancer. Parenteral and enteral therapy, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 5, pp. 91-102, (1991)
[28]  
List M.A., Mumby P., Haraf D., Siston A., Mick R., MacCracken E., Vokes E., Performance and quality of life outcome in patients completing concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocols for head and neck cancer, Qual Life Res, 6, pp. 274-284, (1997)
[29]  
Lopez M.J., Robinson P., Madden T., Highbarger T., Nutritional support and prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer, J Surg Oncol, 55, pp. 33-36, (1994)
[30]  
Malone M., Quality of life of patients receiving home parenteral or enteral nutrition support, Pharmacoeconomics, 5, pp. 101-108, (1994)