An exploration of the relationship between country of origin (COE) and the internationalization-performance paradigm

被引:9
作者
Elango B. [1 ]
Sethi S.P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Management and Quantitative Methods Department, College of Business, Illinois State University, Normal, IL
[2] Department of Management, Zicklin School of Business Baruch College, City University of New York, New York, NY
关键词
Country of origin effect (COE); GDP; Internationalization; Large economics; Performance; Small open economics; Trade in goods;
D O I
10.1007/s11575-007-0021-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The relationship of internationalization with firm performance continues to be a major focus of corporate strategy. While internationalization raises important issues of risk and uncertainty, cross-cultural aspects of employee conduct and consumer behavior, market structure and competition, and political and regulatory dimensions, it also provides new opportunities for growth, profitability and organizational learning. This study seeks to contribute to the topic by empirically investigating the influence of the country of origin effect (COE) on the internationalization and performance relationship. COE, as defined here, is a composite variable that serves as a proxy for differential conditions that might exist in the MNC's home country, conditions which would impact the MNC's performance through internalization of attributes connected with its home country. The findings of this study offer strong support for the underlying notion that a MNC's home country impacts the internationalization-performance relationship. In particular, a positive linear relationship was found between internationalization and performance in countries with relatively small economies and which have extensive trade in their economy, while an inverted U-shaped relationship was found in countries with larger economies which have relatively moderate trade in their economy. © Gabler Verlag 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 392
页数:23
相关论文
共 86 条
[61]  
Pauly L.W., Reich S., National Structures and Multinational Corporate Behavior: Enduring Differences in the Age of Globalization, International Organization, 51, 1, pp. 1-30, (1997)
[62]  
Peng M.W., Cultures, Institutions, and Strategic Choices: Towards an Institutional Perspective on Business Strategy, The Blackwell Handbook of Cross-Cultural Management, pp. 52-66, (2002)
[63]  
Peterson R.A., Jolibert A.J.P., A Meta-Analysis of the Country-Of-Origin Effects, Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 4, pp. 883-900, (1995)
[64]  
Porter M.E., Competitive Advantage, (1985)
[65]  
Porter M.E., Competition in Global Industries: A Conceptual Framework, Competition in Global Industries, pp. 15-60, (1986)
[66]  
Porter M.E., Competitive Advantage of Nations, (1990)
[67]  
Prahalad C.K., Doz Y., The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, (1987)
[68]  
Qian G., Multinationality, Product Diversification, and Profitability of Emerging US Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 6, pp. 611-633, (2002)
[69]  
Ramaswamy K., Multinationality, Configuration, and Performance: A Study of MNEs in the US Drug and Pharmaceutical Sector, Journal of International Management, 1, 2, pp. 231-253, (1995)
[70]  
Ramaswamy K., Kroeck K.G., Renforth W., Measuring the Degree of Internationalization of Firm: A Comment, Journal of International Business Studies, 27, 1, pp. 167-177, (1996)