Can gender differences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors?

被引:113
作者
Klose M. [1 ,2 ]
Jacobi F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Technical University of Dresden, Dept. of Clin. Psychol./Psychother., Dresden
[2] TU Dresden, Klin. Psychologie und Psychotherapie, D-01187 Dresden
关键词
CIDI; DSM-IV; Gender differences; Mental disorders; Risk factors;
D O I
10.1007/s00737-004-0047-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims: Epidemiological studies throughout the world consistently reported higher rates of depression and anxiety disorders in women, whereas men consistently show higher rates of substance and antisocial disorders. The present study examined factors potentially contributing to these gender differences using general population data. Methods: The sample was drawn from population registries (N = 4181) and can be regarded as representative for the adult German population aged 18-65. Mental disorders (DSM-IV) were assessed with a diagnostic interview (CIDI) carried out by clinically trained interviewers. A range of sociodemographic variables was analysed within men, within women, and between genders. Results: The prevalence of common mental disorders (mood, anxiety, substance use and somatoform disorders) is higher among females, with the exception of substance use disorders. Young age was related to substance disorders both in women and in men. Not being married and being unemployed were associated with increased rates of mental disorders in both sexes, but in men stronger than in women. Being retired was associated with depression only in women, whereas belonging to a higher social class, working fulltime and having children appeared to be protective factors for men only. Other sociodemographic factors (concerning education, employment and family status) were not associated with increased rates of mental disorders both in women and men. Conclusion: Overall the emotional advantages or disadvantages of marital status, employment status, number of children, parenthood and social class apply equally to men and women. We cannot explain the female preponderance in most mental disorders by detecting specific unfavourable patterns of sociodemographic correlates, suggesting that determinants of gender differences in common mental disorders are still far from being understood.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 148
页数:15
相关论文
共 114 条
[41]  
Kessler R.C., Epidemiology of women and depression, J Affect Disord, 74, pp. 5-13, (2003)
[42]  
Kessler R.C., McRae J., Trends in the relationships of sex and marital status to psychological distress, Res Commun Ment Health, 4, pp. 109-130, (1984)
[43]  
Kessler R.C., Brown R.L., Broman C.L., Sex differences in psychiatric help-seeking: Evidence from four large-scale surveys, J Health Soc Behav, 22, pp. 49-64, (1981)
[44]  
Kessler R.C., McGonagle K.A., Swartz M., Blazer D.G., Nelson C.B., Sex and depression in the national comorbidity survey I: Lifetime prevalence, chronicity and recurrence, J Affect Disord, 29, pp. 85-96, (1993)
[45]  
Kessler R.C., McGonagle K.A., Nelson C.B., Hughes M., Swartz M., Blazer D.G., Sex and depression in the national comorbidity survey 2. Cohort effects, J Affect Disord, 30, pp. 15-26, (1994)
[46]  
Kessler R.C., McGongale K.A., Zhao S., Nelson C.B., Hughes M., Ehleman S., Wittchen H.U., Kendler K.S., Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 51, pp. 8-19, (1994)
[47]  
Kessler R.C., Wittchen H.U., Abelson J., Zhao S., Methodological issues in assessing psychiatric disorders with self-reports, The Science of Self-report: Implications for Research and Practice, pp. 229-255, (2000)
[48]  
Kornstein S.G., Gender differences in depression: Implications for treatment, J Clin Psychiatry, 58, pp. 12-18, (1997)
[49]  
Kraemer H.C., Kazdin A.E., Offord D.R., Kessler R.C., Jensen P., Kupfer D.J., Coming to terms with the terms of risk, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 54, pp. 337-343, (1997)
[50]  
Lachner G., Wittchen H.U., Perkonigg A., Holly A., Schuster P., Wunderlich U., Turk D., Garczynski E., Pfister H., Structure, content and reliability of the Munich-composite International Diagnostic Interview (M-CIDI). Substance use sections, Eur Addict Res, 4, pp. 28-41, (1998)