Use of controlled randomized trials to evaluate new technologies and new operative procedures in surgery

被引：10

作者：

Law S. ^{[1
]}

Wong J. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Division of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong Medical Centre, Queen Mary Hospital

来源：

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | 1998年 / 2卷 / 6期

关键词：

Consort Statement; Esophageal Anastomosis; Esophagogastric Anastomosis; Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease; Queen Mary Hospital;

D O I：

10.1016/S1091-255X(98)80047-4

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：494 / 495

页数：1

共 14 条

[11]

McNamee D., Horton R., Lies, damn lies, and reports of RCTs, Lancet, 348, (1996)

[12]

Law S., Fok M., Chu K.M., Wong J., Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer. A prospective randomized controlled trial, Ann Surg, 226, pp. 169-173, (1997)

[13]

Majeed A.W., Troy G., Nicholls P., Smythe A., Reed M.W., Stoddard C.J., Peacock J., Johnson A.G., Randomized prospective single blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small incision cholecystectomy, Lancet, 347, pp. 989-994, (1996)

[14]

Slim K., Bousquet J., Kwiatkowski F., Pezet D., Chipponi J., Analysis of randomized controlled trials in laparoscopic surgery, BrJ Surg, 84, pp. 610-614, (1997)

← 1 2 →