Diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection

被引：14

作者：

Hanna R. ^{[1
]}

Raad I.I. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, Houston, TX 77030

来源：

Current Infectious Disease Reports | 2005年 / 7卷 / 6期

关键词：

Bloodstream Infection; Nosocomial Bloodstream Infection; Catheter Segment; Superficial Culture; Related Sepsis;

D O I：

10.1007/s11908-005-0042-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Catheter-related bloodstream infection is a potentially serious condition with a mortality rate of 12% to 25%. Catheter-related bacteremia is difficult to diagnose, and clinical manifestations of the condition have proved to be unspecific and often inconclusive. Microbiologic techniques to diagnose catheter-related bloodstream infection have been developed, some of which require catheter removal whereas others do not. Differential time to positivity has demonstrated marked accuracy and practicality as it allows the catheter to remain in place. Many other methods, such as skin or hub cultures, show less remarkable results, and some, such as intraluminal brushing, may produce adverse effects. Once a catheter-related bloodstream infection is diagnosed, it is classified as either complicated or uncomplicated and treated accordingly. Copyright © 2005 by Current Science Inc.

引用

页码：413 / 419

页数：6

共 48 条

[21]

Cooper G.L., Hopkins C.C., Rapid diagnosis of intravascular catheter-associated infection by direct Gram staining of catheter segments, New Engl. J. Med., 312, pp. 1142-1147, (1985)

[22]

Spencer R.C., Kristinsson K.G., Failure to diagnose intravascular-associated infection by direct gram staining of catheter segments, J. Hosp. Infect., 7, pp. 305-306, (1986)

[23]

Zufferey J., Rime B., Francioli P., Bille J., Simple method for rapid diagnosis of catheter-associated infection by direct acridine orange staining of catheter tips, J. Clin. Microbiol., 26, pp. 175-177, (1988)

[24]

DesJardin J.A., Falagas M.E., Ruthazer R., Et al., Clinical utility of blood cultures drawn from indwelling central venous catheters in hospitalized patients with cancer, Ann. Intern. Med., 131, pp. 641-647, (1999)

[25]

Wing E.J., Norden C.W., Shadduck R.K., Winkelstein A., Use of quantitative bacteriologic techniques to diagnose catheter-related sepsis, Arch. Intern. Med., 139, pp. 482-483, (1979)

[26]

Flynn P.M., Shenep J.L., Barrett F.F., Differential quantitation with a commercial blood culture tube for diagnosis of catheter-related infection, J. Clin. Microbiol., 26, pp. 1045-1046, (1988)

[27]

Capdevila J.A., Planes A.M., Palomar M., Et al., Value of differential quantitative blood cultures in the diagnosis of catheter-related sepsis, Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis., 11, pp. 403-407, (1992)

[28]

Raucher H.S., Hyatt A.C., Barzilai A., Et al., Quantitative blood cultures in the evaluation of septicemia in children with Broviac catheters, J. Pediatr., 104, pp. 29-33, (1984)

[29]

Hanna H., Chatzinikolaou I., Alakech B., Et al., Differential positive quantitative blood cultures (DPQBC) and the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, (2003)

[30]

Franklin J.A., Gaur A.H., Shenep J.L., Et al., In situ diagnosis of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection without peripheral blood culture, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 23, pp. 614-618, (2004)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →