Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students' performances

被引:66
作者
Tal T. [1 ]
Kedmi Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Education in Technology and Science, Technion, Haifa
关键词
Assessment for learning; Citizen science; Science for all; Socioscientific issues; STS;
D O I
10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The "Treasures in the Sea: Use and Abuse" unit that deals with authentic socioscientific issues related to the Mediterranean was developed as part of a national effort to increase scientific literacy. The unit aimed to enhance active participation of the learners and encourage higher order thinking in class by applying teaching methods that reduce the unfamiliarity felt by students. This was expected through an explicit use of a variety of teaching and assessment-for-learning methods, suitable for Science for All students. Our main goal was to examine the culture of Science for All classes in which the unit was enacted. In order to address the main learning objectives, we monitored students' performances in tasks that required the higher order thinking skills of argumentation and value judgment, which are central constituents of decision-making processes. We show that while socioscientific issues were discussed in whole class and small group sessions, and students' argumentation improved, there is still a long way to go in applying a thinking culture in non-science major classes. We suggest that science teachers should shift from traditional content-based and value-free approach, to a sociocultural approach that views science as a community practice and the students as active participants in decision-making processes. © Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 644
页数:29
相关论文
共 38 条
[11]  
Duschl R.A., Osborne J., Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education, Studies in Science Education, 38, pp. 39-72, (2002)
[12]  
Ennis R.H., A Taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities, Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice, pp. 9-26, (1987)
[13]  
Harari H., Tomorrow 98: Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education of Israel, (1994)
[14]  
Hodson D., Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach, (1998)
[15]  
Hughes G., Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implication for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, pp. 426-440, (2000)
[16]  
Keefer M., Ashley K.D., Case-based approaches to professional ethics: A systematic comparison of students' moral reasoning, Journal of Moral Education, 30, pp. 377-398, (2001)
[17]  
Lazarowitz R., Bloch I., Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, pp. 437-457, (2005)
[18]  
Oulton C., Dillon J., Grace M.M., Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues, International Journal of Science Education, 26, pp. 411-423, (2004)
[19]  
Poole M., Beliefs and values in science education, (1995)
[20]  
Resnick L., Education and learning to think, (1987)