Lucas/Kanade meets Horn/Schunck: Combining local and global optic flow methods

被引:978
作者
Bruhn A. [1 ]
Weickert J. [1 ]
Schnörr C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mathematical Image Analysis Group, Fac. of Math. and Computer Science, Saarland University
[2] Comp. Vis., Graphics Pattern R.G., Fac. of Math. and Computer Science, University of Mannheim
关键词
Confidence measures; Differential techniques; Optic flow; Partial differential equations; Performance evaluation; Structure tensor; Variational methods;
D O I
10.1023/B:VISI.0000045324.43199.43
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Differential methods belong to the most widely used techniques for optic flow computation in image sequences. They can be classified into local methods such as the Lucas-Kanade technique or Bigün's structure tensor method, and into global methods such as the Horn/Schunck approach and its extensions. Often local methods are more robust under noise, while global techniques yield dense flow fields. The goal of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding and the design of novel differential methods in four ways: (i) We juxtapose the role of smoothing/regularisation processes that are required in local and global differential methods for optic flow computation, (ii) This discussion motivates us to describe and evaluate a novel method that combines important advantages of local and global approaches: It yields dense flow fields that are robust against noise, (iii) Spatiotemporal and nonlinear extensions as well as multiresolution frameworks are presented for this hybrid method, (iv) We propose a simple confidence measure for optic flow methods that minimise energy functionals. It allows to sparsify a dense flow field gradually, depending on the reliability required for the resulting flow. Comparisons with experiments from the literature demonstrate the favourable performance of the proposed methods and the confidence measure.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:20
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [31] Hinterberger W., Scherzer O., Schnorr C., Weickert J., Analysis of optical flow models in the framework of calculus of variations, Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, 23, 1-2, pp. 69-89, (2002)
  • [32] Horn B., Schunck B., Determining optical flow, Artificial Intelligence, 17, pp. 185-203, (1981)
  • [33] Huber P.J., Robust Statistics, (1981)
  • [34] Jahne B., Digitale Bildverarbeitung, (2001)
  • [35] Ju S., Black M., Jepson A., Skin and bones: Multi-layer, locally affine, optical flow and regularization with transparency, Proc. 1996 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 307-314, (1996)
  • [36] Karlholm J., Local Signal Models for Image Sequence Analysis, (1998)
  • [37] Kearney J.K., Thompson W.B., Boley D.L., Optical flow estimation: An error analysis of gradient-based methods with local optimization, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 9, 2, pp. 229-244, (1987)
  • [38] Kumar A., Tannenbaum A.R., Balas G.J., Optic flow: A curve evolution approach, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 5, 4, pp. 598-610, (1996)
  • [39] Lai S.-H., Vemuri B.C., Reliable and efficient computation of optical flow, International Journal of Computer Vision, 29, 2, pp. 87-105, (1998)
  • [40] Lauze F.-B., Kornprobst P., Lenglet C., Deriche R., Nielsen M., Sur quelques méthodes de calcul de flot optique à partir du tenseur de structure: Synthèse et contribution, Proc. 14th French Conference on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, (2004)