The effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spinal surgery

被引：71

作者：

Chen Z. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Active Diagnostics Inc., Davis, CA 95616

来源：

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing | 2004年 / 18卷 / 4期

关键词：

Electromyographic activity; Evoked potentials; Intraoperative monitoring; Isoflurane; Propofol;

D O I：

10.1007/s10877-005-5097-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objectives: To compare the effects of isoflurane and propofol on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during spinal surgery. Methods. Thirty-five patients were randomly assigned to receive isoflurane (n = 17) or propofol (n = 18) anesthesia. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) following posterior tibial nerve stimulation were recorded before induction as baselines. Isoflurane concentrations and propofol infusions were adjusted to obtain four pre-determined BIS ranges: 65-55, 55-45, 45-35 and 35-25. For each range, a stable state was maintained for at least 10 min to perform IONM. The SEP latency P40 and amplitude P40-N50, the onset latency and amplitude of transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs), and threshold intensity of triggered electromyographic activity (EMG) following pedicle screw stimulation were statistically analyzed. Results. Compared with baseline values, P40 latency increased and P40-N50 amplitude decreased after anesthesia with isoflurane or propofol. Isoflurane caused a dose-dependent depression of SEPs, but propofol did not. TcMEPs were recordable and stable in all patients receiving propofol in each BIS range, but only recordable in 10 (58.8%) receiving isoflurane with BIS > 55, and 3 (17.8%) with BIS < 55. No difference was noted in triggered EMG. Conclusions. Isoflurane inhibited IONM more than propofol. Propofol is recommended for critical spinal surgery, particularly when motor pathway function is monitored. © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005.

引用

页码：303 / 308

页数：5

共 21 条

[11]

Glass P.S., Bloom M., Kearse L., Rosow C., Sebel P., Mansberg P., Bispectral analysis measures sadation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers, Anesthesiology, 86, pp. 836-847, (1997)

[12]

Kearse L., Rosow C., Zaslavsky A., Connors P., Dershwith M., Denman W., Bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis, Anesthesiology, 88, pp. 25-34, (1998)

[13]

Sebel P.S., Lang E., Pampil I.J., White P.F., Cork R., Jopling M., Smith N.T., Glass P.S., Manberg P., Multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic depth, Anesth. Analg., 84, pp. 891-898, (1997)

[14]

Albanese S.A., Spadaro J.A., Lubicky J.P., Henderson N.A., Somatosensory cortical evoked potential changes after deformity correction, Spine, 16, SUPPL., (1991)

[15]

Nuwer M.R., Dawson E.G., Carson L.G., Kanim L.E.A., Sherman J.E., SEP spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: Results of a large multicenter survey, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 96, pp. 6-11, (1995)

[16]

Owen J.H., The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity, Spine, 24, pp. 2649-2662, (1999)

[17]

Nuwer M.R., Spinal cord monitoring, Muscle Nerve, 22, pp. 1620-1630, (1999)

[18]

Sloan T.B., Anesthesia during spinal surgery with electrophysiological monitoring, Semin. Spine Surg., 9, pp. 302-308, (1997)

[19]

Wakasugi M., Hirota K., Roth S., Ito Y., The effects of general anaesthetics on excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in area CAI of the rat hippocampus in vitro, Anesth. Analg., 88, pp. 676-680, (1999)

[20]

Ubags L.H., Kalkman C.J., Been H.D., Influence of isoflurane on myogenic motor evoked potentials to single and multiple transcranial stimuli during nitrous oxide/opioid anesthesia, Neurosurgery, 43, 1, pp. 90-94, (1998)

← 1 2 3 →