A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY OF VASECTOMY AND PROSTATE-CANCER IN UNITED-STATES MEN

被引:116
作者
GIOVANNUCCI, E
TOSTESON, TD
SPEIZER, FE
ASCHERIO, A
VESSEY, MP
COLDITZ, GA
机构
[1] DARTMOUTH COLL,HITCHCOCK MED CTR,DARTMOUTH MED SCH,BIOSTAT & EPIDEMIOL GRP,HANOVER,NH 03756
[2] BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSP,BOSTON,MA 02115
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,BOSTON,MA 02115
[4] UNIV OXFORD,DEPT PUBL HLTH & PRIMARY CARE,OXFORD,ENGLAND
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1993年 / 269卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.269.7.878
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective.-To examine the relationship between vasectomy and prostate cancer. Design.-Retrospective cohort study. Setting.-Husbands of nurses in 11 large states in the United States. Participants.-In questionnaires administered in 1976 and 1978, 14 607 married female participants of the Nurses' Health Study reported vasectomy as the couple's form of contraception. In 1989, we contacted these 14607 women and 14607 age-matched participants whose husbands had not had a vasectomy prior to 1978 to ascertain their husband's disease status between 1976 and 1989. Main Outcome Measure.-Diagnosis of prostate cancer. Results.-During the study period, from 1976 through 1989, 96 new cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed in the cohort. Vasectomy was associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer (age-adjusted relative risk, 1.56; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 2.37; P=.04). The relative risk of prostate cancer increased overtime since vasectomy. Among men who had their vasectomy 20 or more years in the past, the relative risk of prostate cancer was 1.89 (95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.14; P=.005), and after excluding stage A and B cases, the relative risk was 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.95 to 4.43; P=.07). This elevated risk of prostate cancer among vasectomized men persisted when we adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, educational level, body mass index, and geographical area of residence. Conclusions.-These results support evidence from other epidemiologic studies that vasectomy increases risk of prostate cancer. A biological mechanism whereby vasectomy influences the rate of prostate cancer may be related to a diminished secretory rate of prostatic fluid following vasectomy, or, alternatively, to the postvasectomy immune response to sperm antigens, which may cross-react with tumor-associated antigens and suppress tumor immunosurveillance mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 882
页数:5
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [41] LONG-TERM EFFECT OF VASECTOMY ON CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    PERRIN, EB
    WOODS, JS
    NAMEKATA, T
    YAGI, J
    BRUCE, RA
    HOFER, V
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1984, 74 (02) : 128 - 132
  • [42] A SURVEY OF PERSONAL HABITS, SYMPTOMS OF ILLNESS, AND HISTORIES OF DISEASE IN MEN WITH AND WITHOUT VASECTOMIES
    PETITTI, DB
    KLEIN, R
    KIPP, H
    KAHN, W
    SIEGELAUB, AB
    FRIEDMAN, GD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1982, 72 (05) : 476 - 480
  • [43] PIERREPOINT CG, 1975, J REPROD FERTIL, V44, P395
  • [44] ENDOCRINE EFFECTS OF VASECTOMY
    PURVIS, K
    SAKSENA, SK
    CEKAN, Z
    DICZFALUSY, E
    GINER, J
    [J]. CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1976, 5 (03) : 263 - 272
  • [45] VASECTOMY AND THE RISK OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    ROSENBERG, L
    PALMER, JR
    ZAUBER, AG
    WARSHAUER, ME
    STOLLEY, PD
    SHAPIRO, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (06) : 1051 - 1055
  • [46] THE RISK OF MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION 10 OR MORE YEARS AFTER VASECTOMY IN MEN UNDER 55 YEARS OF AGE
    ROSENBERG, L
    SCHWINGL, PJ
    KAUFMAN, DW
    HELMRICH, SP
    PALMER, JR
    SHAPIRO, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1986, 123 (06) : 1049 - 1056
  • [47] THE ETIOLOGY OF PROSTATE-CANCER - WHAT DOES THE EPIDEMIOLOGY SUGGEST
    ROSS, RK
    PAGANINIHILL, A
    HENDERSON, BE
    [J]. PROSTATE, 1983, 4 (04) : 333 - 344
  • [48] RUI H, 1986, J ANDROL, V7, P93
  • [49] SAMUEL T, 1975, CLIN EXP IMMUNOL, V21, P65
  • [50] CAN VASECTOMY REDUCE THE INCIDENCE OF PROSTATIC TUMOR
    SHETH, AR
    PANSE, GT
    [J]. MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 1982, 8 (03) : 237 - 241