RISING CO2 LEVELS AND THEIR POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE FOR CARBON FLOW IN PHOTOSYNTHETIC CELLS

被引:865
作者
STITT, M [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV BAYREUTH, LEHRSTUHL PFLANZENPHYSIOL, W-8580 BAYREUTH, GERMANY
关键词
CO2 (ENHANCED); PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SINK REGULATION; SUCROSE SYNTHESIS; RUBISCO;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01440.x
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In the first part of this review, I discuss how we can predict the direct short-term effect of enhanced CO2 on photosynthetic rate in C3 terrestrial plants. To do this, I consider: (1) to what extent enhanced CO2 Will stimulate or relieve demand on partial processes like carboxylation, light harvesting and electron transport, the Calvin cycle, and end-product synthesis; and (2) the extent to which these various processes actually control the rate of photosynthesis. I conclude that control is usually shared between Rubisco (which responds sensitively to CO2) and other components (which respond less sensitively), and that photosynthesis will be stimulated by 25-75% when the CO2 concentration is doubled from 35 to 70 Pa. This is in good agreement with the published responses. In the next part of the review, I discuss the evidence that most plants undergo a gradual inhibition of photosynthesis during acclimation to enhanced CO2. I argue that this is related to an inadequate demand for carbohydrate in the remainder of the plant. Differences in the long-term response to CO2 may be explained by differences in the sink-source status of plants. depending upon the species, the developmental stage, and the developmental conditions. In the third part of the review, I consider the biochemical mechanisms which are involved in 'sink' regulation of photosynthesis. Accumulating carbohydrate could lead to a direct inhibition of photosynthesis, involving mechanical damage by large starch grains or Pi-limitation due to inhibition of sucrose synthesis. I argue that Pi is important in the short-term regulation of partitioning to sucrose and starch, but that its contribution to 'sink' regulation has not yet been conclusively demonstrated. Indirect or 'adaptive' regulation of photosynthesis is probably more important, involving decreases in amounts of key photosynthetic enzymes, including Rubisco. This decreases the rate of photosynthesis, and potentially would allow resources (e.g. amino acids) to be remobilized from the leaves and reinvested in sink growth to readjust the sink-source balance. In the final part of the review, I argue that similar changes of Rubisco and, possibly, other proteins are probably also involved during acclimation to high CO2.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 762
页数:22
相关论文
共 180 条
[91]   IDENTIFICATION OF HIGH-LEVELS OF TYPE-1 AND TYPE-2A PROTEIN PHOSPHATASES IN HIGHER-PLANTS [J].
MACKINTOSH, C ;
COHEN, P .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 262 (01) :335-339
[93]   RELATIONSHIP OF PHOTOSYNTHETIC RATE TO GROWTH AND FRUITING OF COTTON, SOYBEAN, SORGHUM, AND SUNFLOWER [J].
MAUNEY, JR ;
FRY, KE ;
GUINN, G .
CROP SCIENCE, 1978, 18 (02) :259-263
[94]  
MAUNEY JR, 1979, PHOTOSYNTHETICA, V13, P260
[95]   EFFECT OF TRANSLOCATION-HINDERING PROCEDURES ON SOURCE LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN CUCUMBER [J].
MAYORAL, ML ;
PLAUT, Z ;
REINHOLD, L .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 77 (03) :712-717
[96]   CO2 ENRICHMENT IN GREENHOUSES - CROP RESPONSES [J].
MORTENSEN, LM .
SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, 1987, 33 (1-2) :1-25
[97]   PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RIBULOSE 1,5-BISPHOSPHATE CONCENTRATIONS IN INTACT LEAVES OF XANTHIUM-STRUMARIUM L [J].
MOTT, KA ;
JENSEN, RG ;
OLEARY, JW ;
BERRY, JA .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 76 (04) :968-971
[98]   INFLUENCE OF LEAF STARCH CONCENTRATION ON CO-2 ASSIMILATION IN SOYBEAN [J].
NAFZIGER, ED ;
KOLLER, HR .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1976, 57 (04) :560-563
[99]   CONTROL OF LEAF PHOTOSYNTHESIS RATE BY LEVEL OF ASSIMILATE CONCENTRATION IN LEAF - A REVIEW OF HYPOTHESIS [J].
NEALES, TF ;
INCOLL, LD .
BOTANICAL REVIEW, 1968, 34 (02) :107-&
[100]   REDUCED-ACTIVITY MUTANTS OF PHOSPHOGLUCOSE ISOMERASE IN THE CYTOSOL AND CHLOROPLAST OF CLARKIA-XANTIANA .2. STUDY OF THE MECHANISMS WHICH REGULATE PHOTOSYNTHATE PARTITIONING [J].
NEUHAUS, HE ;
KRUCKEBERG, AL ;
FEIL, R ;
STITT, M .
PLANTA, 1989, 178 (01) :110-122