A TECHNOLOGY GAP APPROACH TO WHY GROWTH-RATES DIFFER

[21] TECHNOLOGICAL ADAPTATION, OPTIMUM LEVEL OF BACKWARDNESS AND RATE OF PER CAPITA INCOME GROWTH - ECONOMETRIC APPROACH [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIST, 1975, 19 (01): : 23 - 31

[22] PAVITT K, 1979, FUTURES DEC, P458

[23] PAVITT K, 1980, FUTURES FEB, P35

[24] PAVITT K, 1982, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIE

[25] Posner M.V., 1961, OXFORD ECON PAP, V13, P323, DOI [10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040877, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A040877]

[26] RATES OF INVENTION - INTERNATIONAL PATENT COMPARISONS [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1978, 7 (04) : 324 - 340

[27] Schmookler J, 1966, INVENTION EC GROWTH

[28] Schumpeter J.A., 1934, THEORY EC DEV

[29] Schumpeter J. A., 1939, BUSINESS CYCLES, V1

[30] Schumpeter Joseph Alois, 1947, CAPITALISM SOCIALISM

[21] TECHNOLOGICAL ADAPTATION, OPTIMUM LEVEL OF BACKWARDNESS AND RATE OF PER CAPITA INCOME GROWTH - ECONOMETRIC APPROACH [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIST, 1975, 19 (01): : 23 - 31

[22] PAVITT K, 1979, FUTURES DEC, P458

[23] PAVITT K, 1980, FUTURES FEB, P35

[24] PAVITT K, 1982, EMERGING TECHNOLOGIE

[25] Posner M.V., 1961, OXFORD ECON PAP, V13, P323, DOI [10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a040877, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.OEP.A040877]

[26] RATES OF INVENTION - INTERNATIONAL PATENT COMPARISONS [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 1978, 7 (04) : 324 - 340

[27] Schmookler J, 1966, INVENTION EC GROWTH

[28] Schumpeter J.A., 1934, THEORY EC DEV

[29] Schumpeter J. A., 1939, BUSINESS CYCLES, V1

[30] Schumpeter Joseph Alois, 1947, CAPITALISM SOCIALISM