ACETABULAR REVISION WITH THE BURCH-SCHNIEDER ANTIPROTRUSIO CAGE AND CANCELLOUS ALLOGRAFT BONE

被引:104
作者
PETERS, CL
CURTAIN, M
SAMUELSON, KM
机构
[1] Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine
[2] LDS Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah
关键词
ACETABULAR REVISION; ANTIPROTRUSIO CAGE; ALLOGRAFT BONE; ACETABULAR DEFICIENCY; MIGRATION; HIP CENTER;
D O I
10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80179-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
A retrospective review of 25 patients who underwent 28 acetabular revisions with the Burch-Schnieder antiprotrusio cage (Protek, Berne, Switzerland) and cancellous allograft bone was performed. Follow-up periods averaged 33 months. Patients had averaged 2.1 prior operations per hip. Twenty-two hips had American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons type III (combined segmental and cavitary bone loss) acetabular deficiency. Five hips had type II (cavitary bone loss) and one hip had type I (segmental bone loss) acetabular deficiency. After surgery, 80% of the patients had mild or no pain and 80% functioned as at least a community ambulator. Radiographic analysis included a detailed study of implant migration and the degree to which the hip center and bone stock were restored. Significant component migration was documented in 14% of the acetabular reconstructions. The hip center was improved from a preoperative side-to-side difference of 12.5 mm to 4.9 mm at final evaluation (P = .01). Average medial wall bone stock was improved from 1.9 mm before surgery to 10.1 mm postrevision (P < .01). No patients required revision of the antiprotrusio cage for problems related to the acetabular reconstruction. For failed acetabular components associated with moderate to massive bone loss, the antiprotrusio cage reliably reconstituted the hip joint center and acetabular bone stock. The short-term incidence of mechanical loosening parallels that of previously reported acetabular reconstruction techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 312
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Mulroy RD, Harris WH, Failure of acetabular autogenous grafts in total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg, 72 A, (1990)
[12]  
Trancik TM, Stulberg BN, Wilke AH, Feighn DA, Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum during revision total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg, 68 A, (1986)
[13]  
Gerber SD, Harris WH, Femoral head autografting to augment acetabular deficiency in patients requiring total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg, 68 A, (1986)
[14]  
Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Et al., Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip replacement: a three to six year follow-up, J Bone Joint Surg, 75 A, (1993)
[15]  
Harris WH, Krushell RJ, Galante JO, Results of cementless revisions of total hip arthroplasties using the Harris—Galante prosthesis, Clin Orthop, 235, (1988)
[16]  
Hedley AK, Gruen TA, Ruoff DP, Revision of failed total hip arthroplasties with uncemented porous-coated anatomic components, Clin Orthop, 235, (1988)
[17]  
McGann WA, Welch RB, Picetti GD, Acetabular preparation in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty, Clin Orthop, 235, (1988)
[18]  
Emerson RH, Heal WC, Berlusich FM, Matinin TI, Noncemented acetabular revision arthroplasty using allograft bone, Clin Orthop, 249, (1989)
[19]  
Berry DJ, Muller ME, Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency, J Bone Joint Surg, 74 B, (1992)
[20]  
Rosson J, Schatzker J, The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabulae, J Bone Joint Surg, 74 B, (1992)