TOXICITY OF PULPISPAD USING 4 DIFFERENT CELL-TYPES

被引:18
作者
PISSIOTIS, E [1 ]
SPANGBERG, LSW [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CONNECTICUT,CTR HLTH,SCH DENT MED,DEPT RESTORAT DENT & ENDODONTOL,FARMINGTON,CT 06030
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1991.tb01150.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The cytotoxic effect of a zinc oxide-eugenol-based paste (Pulpispad) was evaluated in vitro after setting for 1 day and 1 week. Target cells were L929 cells, gingival, periodontal ligament and pulpal fibroblasts. The material was incubated with the cells for 4 and 24 hours, and its toxicity was evaluated with the Cr-51-release method. Pulpispad was highly cytotoxic to all cell lines even after setting for 1 week. The use of Pulpispad is not recommended for future clinical application. The various responses among the four cell lines indicated that diploid cell lines can, under certain circumstances, be less sensitive than aneuploid cell lines. It is therefore suggested that in the evaluation of biomaterials the choice of cell lines should be carefully considered, as they can display varying sensitivities.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Al-Nazhan S., Spangberg L., Morphological cell changes due to chemical toxicity of a dental material: an electron microscopic study on human periodontal ligament fibroblasts and L929 cells, Journal of Endodontics, 16, pp. 129-134, (1990)
[2]  
Recommended Standard Practices for Biological Evaluation of Dental Materials, (1982)
[3]  
Arnold L.F., Barum P., In vitro culture of periodontal ligament cells, Journal of Dental Research, 51, pp. 953-959, (1972)
[4]  
Briseno B.M., Willershausen B., Root canal sealer cytotoxicity on human gingival fibroblasts. 1. Zinc oxide—eugenol‐based sealers, Journal of Endodontics, 16, pp. 383-386, (1990)
[5]  
Browne R.M., In vitro cytotoxicity testing of dental restorative materials, CRC Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility, 1, pp. 85-109, (1985)
[6]  
Browne R.M., Tyas M.J., Biological testing of dental restorative materials in vitro—a review, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 6, pp. 365-374, (1979)
[7]  
Brunette D.M., Melcher A.H., Moe H.K., Culture and origin of epithelium‐like and fibroblastic‐like cells from porcine periodontal ligament explants and cell suspensions, Archives of Oral Biology, 21, pp. 393-400, (1976)
[8]  
Dahl B.L., ORstavik J., Cytotoxicity of temporary crown and bridge materials, Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 3, pp. 341-347, (1976)
[9]  
Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials, International Dental Journal, 30, pp. 140-188, (1980)
[10]  
Feigal R.J., Yesilsoy C, Messer H.H., Nelson J., Differential sensitivity of normal human pulp and transformed mouse fibroblasts to a cytotoxic challenge, Archives of Oral Biology, 30, pp. 609-613, (1985)