THE EFFECT OF POSITIONING ON DUAL ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETRY OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR

被引:66
作者
WILSON, CR
FOGELMAN, I
BLAKE, GM
RODIN, A
机构
[1] MED COLL WISCONSIN,DEPT RADIOL,MED PHYS SECT,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[2] GUYS HOSP,DEPT NUCL MED,LONDON SE1 9RT,ENGLAND
来源
BONE AND MINERAL | 1991年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
BONE; MINERALIZATION; DENSITOMETRY; DUAL ENERGY; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; DXA; PROXIMAL FEMUR;
D O I
10.1016/0169-6009(91)90051-Z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The influence of subject repositioning on the precision of bone mineral densitometry of the proximal femur using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was estimated by determining the variation in the bone mineral density (BMD) of subjects scanned with their foot and leg position varying from that routinely used in clinical scanning. The mean variations in BMD of the femoral neck, Ward's triangle and trochanter were 2.7, 4.1 and 1.7%, respectively, in eight subjects scanned with the foot internally rotated by 0, 13 and 27 degrees. The mean variations in BMD in four subjects scanned with the leg in the customary position and abducted +/- 6 degrees from the conventionally used scanning position were 3.6, 2.8 and 1.6% for the same respective regions of interest. For diagnostic applications, the orientation of the leg and foot during scanning is relatively unimportant since the variations in BMD introduced by the different foot and leg orientations likely to be encountered in routine clinical scanning are small compared to the intrapopulation variation in BMD. However, for monitoring changes in BMD longitudinally, careful repositioning of the foot and leg will be necessary to achieve precision in vivo of less than 1%.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 76
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   X-RAY DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY - A NEW METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF BONE-DENSITY [J].
CULLUM, ID ;
ELL, PJ ;
RYDER, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (739) :587-592
[2]   APPROPRIATE USE OF BONE DENSITOMETRY [J].
GENANT, HK ;
BLOCK, JE ;
STEIGER, P ;
GLUEER, CC ;
ETTINGER, B ;
HARRIS, ST .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :817-822
[3]  
GLUER CC, 1990, RADIOLOGY, V176, P875, DOI 10.1148/radiology.176.3.875-b
[4]   COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHY [J].
GLUER, CC ;
STEIGER, P ;
SELVIDGE, R ;
ELLIESENKLIEFOTH, K ;
HAYASHI, C ;
GENANT, HK .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (01) :223-228
[5]  
HEANEY RP, 1986, BONE MINER, V1, P99
[6]  
MAZESS RB, 1987, BONE MINER, V2, P211
[7]  
MAZESS RB, 1989, P SOC EXP BIOL MED, V191, P261
[8]   CHANGES IN BONE-MINERAL DENSITY OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR AND SPINE WITH AGING - DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POST-MENOPAUSAL AND SENILE OSTEOPOROSIS SYNDROMES [J].
RIGGS, BL ;
WAHNER, HW ;
SEEMAN, E ;
OFFORD, KP ;
DUNN, WL ;
MAZESS, RB ;
JOHNSON, KA ;
MELTON, LJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1982, 70 (04) :716-723
[9]   COMPARISON OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY FOR BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
WAHNER, HW ;
DUNN, WL ;
BROWN, ML ;
RIGGS, BL .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 63 (11) :1075-1084
[10]  
WAHNER HW, 1988, BONE MINERAL MEASURE, P179