A POPULATION-BASED COMPARISON OF QUANTITATIVE DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY WITH DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE SPINE AND HIP

被引:17
作者
HOLBROOK, TL
BARRETTCONNOR, E
KLAUBER, M
SARTORIS, D
机构
[1] Department of Community and Family Medicine, M-031C, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, 92093, California
关键词
BONE MINERAL DENSITY; QUANTITATIVE DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; POPULATION-BASED SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1007/BF02556250
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) is currently the most widely used method for noninvasive bone mineral density (BMD) measurement of the axial skeleton. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) is a recently developed technique that uses an X-ray tube as a photon source; it has demonstrated several significant advantages over DPA in preliminary studies. We report here a quantitative comparison of the DEXA and DPA technologies using a Hologic DEXA (Hologic QDR model 1000, Waltham, MA) scanner and a Lunar DPA (Lunar Radiation DP3, gandolineum-153 source) scanner at both the proximal femur and lumbar spine sites using bone density measurements from a population-based sample of older white men and women who had complete DEXA and DPA measurements of the hip (n = 217) or the spine (n = 176). To examine the relationship of BMD measured by the DPA scanner to BMD measured on the DEXA scanner, normal least squares linear regression was used to regress the DPA BMD on the DEXA BMD for each site. DEXA values were consistently lower than DPA values, with an average difference of 16%. The squared multiple correlation (R2) values were at or above 0.95 for almost all sites, with Ward's triangle having the lowest value (0.89). The slope for all sites was similar, ranging from 0.94 to 1.1. Research and clinical centers that wish to change to DEXA technology because of its shorter examination time and greater precision can therefore compare DEXA with DPA values using representative conversion factors.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 307
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[11]  
Powell MR, 1983, CLIN DISORDERS BONE, P58
[12]   FRACTURE PREVALENCE AND BONE-MINERAL MASS IN OSTEOPOROSIS MEASURED WITH COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND DUAL ENERGY PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY [J].
RAYMAKERS, JA ;
HOEKSTRA, O ;
VANPUTTEN, J ;
KERKHOFF, H ;
DUURSMA, SA .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1986, 15 (03) :191-197
[13]   BONE-MINERAL CONTENT IN EARLY-POSTMENOPAUSAL AND POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROTIC WOMEN - COMPARISON OF MEASUREMENT METHODS [J].
REINBOLD, WD ;
GENANT, HK ;
REISER, UJ ;
HARRIS, ST ;
ETTINGER, B .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 160 (02) :469-478
[14]   MEASUREMENT OF LUMBAR SPINE BONE-MINERAL - A COMPARISON OF DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
SAMBROOK, PN ;
BARTLETT, C ;
EVANS, R ;
HESP, R ;
KATZ, D ;
REEVE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1985, 58 (691) :621-624
[15]   DUAL-ENERGY PROJECTION RADIOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF FEMORAL-NECK STRENGTH, DENSITY, AND MINERALIZATION [J].
SARTORIS, DJ ;
SOMMER, FG ;
KOSEK, J ;
GIES, A ;
CARTER, D .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1985, 20 (05) :476-485
[16]  
SARTORIS DJ, 1985, AJR, P605
[17]   AN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TEST FOR NORMALITY (COMPLETE SAMPLES) [J].
SHAPIRO, SS ;
WILK, MB .
BIOMETRIKA, 1965, 52 :591-&
[18]   SINGLE-PHOTON AND DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY IN OSTEOPOROSIS AND OSTEOMALACIA [J].
WAHNER, HW .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (04) :305-315
[19]   COMPARISON OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY FOR BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
WAHNER, HW ;
DUNN, WL ;
BROWN, ML ;
RIGGS, BL .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1988, 63 (11) :1075-1084