WHY DO FIRMS CONTRIVE SHORTAGES - THE ECONOMICS OF INTENTIONAL MISPRICING

被引:18
作者
HADDOCK, DD [1 ]
MCCHESNEY, FS [1 ]
机构
[1] EMORY UNIV,ATLANTA,GA 30322
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1465-7295.1994.tb01351.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given buyers' product-specific information capital, firms may increase long-run profits by ''under-pricing'' (rationing) rather than clearing markets when demands or costs rise transitorily. To minimize resulting shortages' costs, sellers predictably would distinguish among customer groups, managing any queues of disappointed loyal buyers that materialized (but largely ignoring transitory buyer queues), and would discourage resale. Unlike other shortage models, short-run excess demand necessarily implies neither buyers who prefer consuming in groups, nor waiting costs that are negligible. Any sense of ''unfair'' price increases would arise endogenously from sellers' failures to value appropriately customers' otherwise prudent informational investments.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 581
页数:20
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
FISHER LM, 1990, NY TIMES 0413, P1
[22]  
FRECH HE, 1987, Q J EC FEB, P97
[23]  
FRIEDMAN M, 1990, PRICE THEORY
[24]  
HAY GA, 1970, AM EC REV SEP, P531
[25]  
HIRSCHLEIFER J, 1979, J ECON LIT, P1375
[26]  
HOLDEN BA, 1994, WALL STREET J JAN, P2
[27]  
KAHNEMAN D, 1986, AM ECON REV, V76, P728
[28]  
KENNEY RW, 1983, J OF LAW AND EC OCT, P497
[29]  
KEYNES JM, 1936, GENERAL THEORY EMPLO
[30]   VERTICAL INTEGRATION, APPROPRIABLE RENTS, AND THE COMPETITIVE CONTRACTING PROCESS [J].
KLEIN, B ;
CRAWFORD, RG ;
ALCHIAN, AA .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1978, 21 (02) :297-326