INTERACTIONS AMONG PHYTOPLANKTON, PERIPHYTON, AND MACROPHYTES IN TEMPERATE FRESH-WATERS AND ESTUARIES

被引:551
作者
SANDJENSEN, K
BORUM, J
机构
[1] Freshwater Biological Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, 3400 Hillerød
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0304-3770(91)90042-4
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The physico-chemical environment and the resource needs of phytoplankton, periphyton and macrophytes are markedly different. In this paper we compare the characteristics of the different phototrophs with respect to water movements and diffusive boundary layers, nutrient demands, carbon and oxygen dynamics, and light climate and light requirements. We discuss how these characteristics affect growth dynamics, biomass limitation and biotic interactions of phototrophs in natural habitats, and, finally, we discuss how plant community dominance can be predicted from ecosystem size, depth and nutrient loading. Phytoplankters live in a stirred environment with thin diffusive boundary layers, low nutrient availability and a highly variable light climate. They grow fast and have high nutrient requirements but their biomass is often nutrient limited. Diffusive boundary layers of benthic microalgae and rooted macrophytes are thicker and reduce the exchange of gases and nutrients. Sessile organisms live in a more predictable light climate but may experience severe self-shading and generally grow more slowly than phytoplankters. The nutrient requirements of rooted macrophytes are lower than those of microalgae because of low growth rates, high internal C:N:P ratios and the existence of nutrient conserving mechanisms, and nutrient limitation is less important because the plants exploit the rich nutrient pools of the sediment. The phototrophs compete for light, nutrients and inorganic carbon, and the balance among phototrophs changes with size, depth and nutrient richness of the ecosystem. Phytoplankters dominate in deep lakes and oceanic waters and may also, together with periphyton, dominate in nutrient-rich shallow waters because of shading effects on macrophytes and benthic microalgae. However, shallow lakes and estuaries with low nutrient availability in the water column are dominated by benthic phototrophs because of their lower nutrient requirements and contact to sediment nutrient pools.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 175
页数:39
相关论文
共 140 条
[22]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN MACROPHYTES, EPIPHYTES AND HERBIVORES - AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH [J].
BRONMARK, C .
OIKOS, 1985, 45 (01) :26-30
[23]   INTERACTIONS BETWEEN EPIPHYTES, MACROPHYTES AND FRESH-WATER SNAILS - A REVIEW [J].
BRONMARK, C .
JOURNAL OF MOLLUSCAN STUDIES, 1989, 55 :299-311
[24]   PREDICTION OF CHLOROPHYLL A CONCENTRATIONS IN FLORIDA LAKES - IMPORTANCE OF AQUATIC MACROPHYTES [J].
CANFIELD, DE ;
SHIREMAN, JV ;
COLLE, DE ;
HALLER, WT ;
WATKINS, CE ;
MACEINA, MJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 1984, 41 (03) :497-501
[25]   PHOSPHORUS SOURCES FOR AQUATIC WEEDS - WATER OR SEDIMENTS [J].
CARIGNAN, R ;
KALFF, J .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4434) :987-989
[26]  
CARIGNAN R, 1982, LIMNOLOGY OCEANOGRAP, V27, P341
[27]   PHOSPHORUS FLUX FROM LAKE-SEDIMENTS - EFFECT OF EPIPELIC ALGAL OXYGEN PRODUCTION [J].
CARLTON, RG ;
WETZEL, RG .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1988, 33 (04) :562-570
[28]   EFFECTS OF SUBMERSED MACROPHYTES ON ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES [J].
CARPENTER, SR ;
LODGE, DM .
AQUATIC BOTANY, 1986, 26 (3-4) :341-370
[29]   REGULATION OF LAKE PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY BY FOOD WEB STRUCTURE [J].
CARPENTER, SR ;
KITCHELL, JF ;
HODGSON, JR ;
COCHRAN, PA ;
ELSER, JJ ;
ELSER, MM ;
LODGE, DM ;
KRETCHMER, D ;
HE, X ;
VONENDE, CN .
ECOLOGY, 1987, 68 (06) :1863-1876
[30]   THE RELATIVE CONTRIBUTION OF AQUATIC MACROPHYTES AND THEIR EPIPHYTES TO THE PRODUCTION OF MACROPHYTE BEDS [J].
CATTANEO, A ;
KALFF, J .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1980, 25 (02) :280-289