A NEW APPROACH FOR UTILITY ANALYSIS

被引:38
作者
RAJU, NS
NORMAND, J
BURKE, MJ
机构
[1] US POSTAL SERV,WASHINGTON,DC
[2] NYU,LEONARD N STERN SCH BUSINESS,NEW YORK,NY 10003
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.3
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A new utility analysis approach is presented. It is demonstrated that the new approach does not require the direct estimation of the most problematic component of current utility analysis equations, the standard deviation of Y. The parsimony of the new approach provides the potential for more directly linking decision-theoretic utility analysis with economic and accounting concepts. The development of the new approach highlights the many necessary and untested assumptions of current utility models. It also points to a need for reassessing the psychometric validity of correcting for criterion unreliability in utility analysis. Furthermore, the CREPID and 40% and 70% rules for estimating the standard deviation of Y are shown to be special cases of the new approach. Research on the efficacy of the assumptions and applicability of the new approach is advocated.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   ALTERNATE METHODS OF ESTIMATING THE DOLLAR VALUE OF PERFORMANCE [J].
EATON, NK ;
WING, H ;
MITCHELL, KJ .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 38 (01) :27-40
[22]  
Edwards E. O., 1961, THEORY MEASUREMENT B, pW
[23]   EFFICACY OF MODIFIED CREPID SDYS ON THE BASIS OF ARCHIVAL ORGANIZATIONAL DATA [J].
EDWARDS, JE ;
FREDERICK, JT ;
BURKE, MJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (03) :529-535
[24]   DECISION-MAKING UNDER AMBIGUITY [J].
EINHORN, HJ ;
HOGARTH, RM .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS, 1986, 59 (04) :S225-S250
[25]  
Fitz-Enz J., 1984, MEASURE HUMAN RESOUR
[26]  
Flamholtz E.G., 1985, HUMAN RESOURCE ACCOU
[27]  
Ghiselli E.E., 1981, MEASUREMENT THEORY B
[28]  
Ghorpade J. V., 1988, JOB ANAL HDB HUMAN R
[29]  
GREER OL, 1987, J APPL PSYCHOL, V72, P588
[30]   LINEARITY OF CRITERION - GATB APTITUDE RELATIONSHIPS [J].
HAWK, JA .
MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN GUIDANCE, 1970, 2 (04) :249-251