DOES DIGESTIBILITY OF MEAT PROTEIN HELP EXPLAIN LARGE-BOWEL CANCER RISK

被引:86
作者
SILVESTER, KR
CUMMINGS, JH
机构
[1] MRC Dunn Clinical Nutrition Centre, Cambridge, CB2
来源
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | 1995年 / 24卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01635589509514417
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
An association between meat eating and large bowel cancer risk has been shown in a variety of epidemiologic studies. One reason could be that meat is less well digested than other protein foods and leads to greater amounts of protein entering the large bowel and being metabolized by colonic bacteria to potential carcinogens. To test this hypothesis, five subjects with ileostomies were fed, for five days a basal diet to which were added test meals of cheese, a small or a large fried beef steak, and a large steak with resistant starch (RS). Ileal true nitrogen digestibility was similar for all five diets: control, 86.3%; cheese, 89.4%; low beef; 88.6%; high beef; 89.6%; and high beef + RS, 88.7%. Beef; at bath low and high intake levels, was as well digested as cheese, suggesting that poor digestibility of meat does not explain the association between meat intake and large bowel cancer risk. Ileal starch output on the high beef + RS diet was 27% greater than expected on the basis of the measurement of dietary RS in vitro (p = 0.002). Ileal nitrogen output was strongly related to the amount of dietary nitrogen (p = 0.005 for linear trend), and this was confirmed by a meta analysis with eight other published studies. The relation between meat and large bowel cancer may reflect higher protein intakes in meat eaters or may be explained by other mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 288
页数:10
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   INFLUENCE OF PH, NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY, AND GROWTH-RATE ON AMINE PRODUCTION BY BACTEROIDES-FRAGILIS AND CLOSTRIDIUM-PERFRINGENS [J].
ALLISON, C ;
MACFARLANE, GT .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1989, 55 (11) :2894-2898
[2]  
ANDERSSON H, 1992, EUR J CLIN NUTR, V46, pS69
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AND CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY IN DIFFERENT COUNTRIES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DIETARY PRACTICES [J].
ARMSTRONG, B ;
DOLL, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1975, 15 (04) :617-631
[4]   A POPULATION-BASED CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF COLORECTAL-CANCER IN MAJORCA .1. DIETARY FACTORS [J].
BENITO, E ;
OBRADOR, A ;
STIGGELBOUT, A ;
BOSCH, FX ;
MULET, M ;
MUNOZ, N ;
KALDOR, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 45 (01) :69-76
[5]   MEAT, STARCH, AND NONSTARCH POLYSACCHARIDES AND LARGE BOWEL-CANCER [J].
BINGHAM, SA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1988, 48 (03) :762-767
[6]  
BINGHAM SA, 1993, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V104, pA389
[7]   EFFECTS OF DIETARY FIBER AND TANNINS FROM APPLE PULP ON THE COMPOSITION OF FECES IN RATS [J].
BRAVO, L ;
SAURACALIXTO, F ;
GONI, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1992, 67 (03) :463-473
[8]  
CALKINS B M, 1984, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, V40, P896
[9]   STARCH INTAKE AND COLORECTAL-CANCER RISK - AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON [J].
CASSIDY, A ;
BINGHAM, SA ;
CUMMINGS, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (05) :937-942
[10]  
CCummings J., 1989, GASTROINTESTINAL OES, P201