EFFECTS OF INTRALUMINAL ACIDIFICATION ON ESOPHAGEAL MOTOR-ACTIVITY

被引:16
作者
BONTEMPO, I [1 ]
PIRETTA, L [1 ]
CORAZZIARI, E [1 ]
MICHETTI, F [1 ]
ANZINI, F [1 ]
TORSOLI, A [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA,POLICLIN UMBERTO 1,MED CLIN 2,CATTEDRA GASTROENTEROL 1,I-00161 ROME,ITALY
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.35.7.884
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
This study assessed the effect of prolonged intraluminal acidification on the motor activity of the entire oesophageal body (under controlled conditions). Intraoesophageal pressures were recorded in 13 endoscopy negative subjects with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in whom saline, HCl 0.1 N, and saline solutions were infused (1.5 ml/min) blindly in the oesophageal body, 6 cm distal to the upper oesophageal sphincter for three consecutive periods of 45 minutes each. These findings were compared with those of a control group. Intraoesophageal acidification caused an increase in the deglutition frequency (p<0.02), the occurrence of multipeaked waves (p<0.04) as well as a decrease of the propagating velocity (p<0.04) of the primary peristaltic contractions. Furthermore, intraoesophageal acidification determined an increase, at all levels of the oesophagus, of the duration (p<0.04)and, more noticeable in the proximal oesophageal body, of the amplitude (p<0.02) of primary peristaltic contraction waves. In conclusion prolonged intraoesophageal acidification can considerably affect frequency of deglutition, morphology, and propagating patterns of primary peristaltic contractions. This study shows that these effects are independent from volume distension of the oesophagus and supports the presence of acid sensitive receptors in the oesophageal mucosa.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 890
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE AS AN INDEX OF GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL ACID REFLUX [J].
AHTARIDIS, G ;
SNAPE, WJ ;
COHEN, S .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1981, 26 (11) :993-998
[2]   ESOPHAGEAL MOTOR FUNCTION AND RESPONSE TO ACID PERFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS [J].
BURNS, TW ;
VENTURATOS, SG .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1985, 30 (06) :529-535
[3]  
CAMPO S, 1989, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V84, P928
[4]  
COHEN S, 1972, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V63, P1066
[5]  
CORAZZIARI E, 1978, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V75, P275
[6]   INTRALUMINAL PH AND ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY IN PATIENTS WITH GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX [J].
CORAZZIARI, E ;
MATERIA, E ;
POZZESSERE, C ;
ANZINI, F ;
TORSOLI, A .
DIGESTION, 1986, 35 (03) :151-157
[7]   COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS EDROPHONIUM AND ESOPHAGEAL ACID PERFUSION DURING ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN [J].
DECAESTECKER, JS ;
PRYDE, A ;
HEADING, RC .
GUT, 1988, 29 (08) :1029-1034
[8]  
GARABEDIAN M, 1971, SURG CLIN N AM, V51, P589
[9]   ESOPHAGEAL ACIDIFICATION DOES NOT INCREASE LOWER ESOPHAGEAL SPHINCTER PRESSURE [J].
HELM, JF ;
MASSEY, BT ;
MARTIN, CJ ;
DODDS, WJ ;
HOGAN, WJ ;
ARNDORFER, RC .
GUT, 1990, 31 (03) :266-269
[10]   EFFECT OF DRY SWALLOWS AND WET SWALLOWS OF DIFFERENT VOLUMES ON ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS [J].
HOLLIS, JB ;
CASTELL, DO .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 38 (06) :1161-1164