ECOLOGIC STUDIES - BIASES, MISCONCEPTIONS, AND COUNTEREXAMPLES

被引:364
作者
GREENLAND, S
ROBINS, J
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT EPIDEMIOL,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[2] HARVARD UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT EPIDEMIOL,BOSTON,MA 02115
[3] HARVARD UNIV,SCH PUBL HLTH,DEPT BIOSTAT,BOSTON,MA 02115
关键词
BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMETRY; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; MODELS; STATISTICAL; RISK; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117069
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many authors have pointed out that relative-risk estimates derived from ecologic data are vulnerable to biases not found in estimates derived from individual-level data. Nevertheless, biases in ecologic studies still are often dealt with in the same manner as biases in other observational studies, and so are not given adequate treatment. This commentary reviews and illustrates some of the more recent findings about bias in ecologic estimates. Special attention is given to problems of ecologic confounder control when individual risks follow a nonlinear model, and to misconceptions about ecologic bias that have appeared in the literature.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 760
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
ROBINS JM, 1988, 21ST ANN M SOC EP RE
[22]   ECOLOGICAL CORRELATIONS AND THE BEHAVIOR OF INDIVIDUALS [J].
Robinson, W. S. .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1950, 15 (03) :351-357
[23]   DIFFICULTIES WITH REGRESSION-ANALYSES OF AGE-ADJUSTED RATES [J].
ROSENBAUM, PR ;
RUBIN, DB .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (02) :437-443
[25]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF MIS-SPECIFIED MODELS [J].
WHITE, H .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (01) :1-25