Do corporate governance mechanisms influence CEO compensation? An empirical investigation of UK companies

被引:128
作者
Ozkan, Neslihan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
关键词
CEO compensation; Corporate Governance;
D O I
10.1016/j.mulfin.2006.08.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to empirically examine the influence of corporate governance mechanisms, that is, ownership and board structure of companies, on the level of CEO compensation for a sample of 414 large UK companies for the fiscal year 2003/2004. The results show that measures of board and ownership structures explain a significant amount of cross-sectional variation in the total CEO compensation, which is the sum of cash and equity-based compensation, after controlling other firm characteristics. We find that firms with larger board size and a higher proportion of non-executive directors on their boards pay their CEOs higher compensation, suggesting that non-executive directors are not more efficient in monitoring than executive directors. We also find that institutional ownership and block-holder ownership have a significant and negative impact on CEO compensation. Our results are consistent with the existence of active monitoring by block-holders and institutional shareholders. Finally, the results show that CEO compensation is lower when the directors' ownership is higher. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 364
页数:16
相关论文
共 23 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, REPORT COMMITTEE FIN
[3]   The impact of the institutional and regulatory environment on shareholder voting [J].
Bethel, JE ;
Gillan, SL .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 31 (04) :29-54
[4]  
Cheung Y-L, 2005, J EMPIRICAL FINANCE, V12, P511, DOI [10.1016/j.jempfin.2004.10.001, DOI 10.1016/J.JEMPFIN.2004.10.001]
[5]   LIQUIDITY VERSUS CONTROL - THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR AS CORPORATE MONITOR [J].
COFFEE, JC .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1991, 91 (06) :1277-1368
[6]  
CONYON MJ, 2000, EC J, V0110
[7]   Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance [J].
Core, JE ;
Holthausen, RW ;
Larcker, DF .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 51 (03) :371-406
[8]   Executive remuneration, executive dismissal and institutional shareholdings [J].
Cosh, A ;
Hughes, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1997, 15 (04) :469-492
[9]   The Cadbury Committee, corporate performance, and top management turnover [J].
Dahya, J ;
McConnell, JJ ;
Travlos, NG .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (01) :461-483
[10]  
Fama E., 1983, J LAW ECON, V26, P310