Assessment of nutritional status of gynecological cancer cases in India and comparison of subjective and objective nutrition assessment parameters

被引:37
作者
Das, Ushashree [1 ]
Patel, Shilpa [1 ]
Dave, Kalpana [1 ]
Bhansali, Ronak [1 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Canc Res Inst, Dept Gynaecol Oncol, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
BMI; gynecologic cancer; hemoglobin; nutrition; scored PG-SGA; serum albumin;
D O I
10.4103/2278-330X.126518
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To assess the nutritional status of gynecological cancer patients using scored Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) then compare it with the body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin, serum albumin, and approximate percentage weight lost in last 1 month so as to find any one parameter that can be used in place of the comprehensive assessment tool. Materials and Methods: Sixty gynecological cancer patients were assessed for their nutritional status using BMI, serum albumin, hemoglobin, percentage weight lost in last 1 month, and scored PG-SGA. Correlation, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the former four parameters compared to scored PG-SGA were calculated. Results: 88.33% of cases were at risk of or had some degree of malnutrition according to scored PG-SGA. Serum albumin level % 2 g/dl had highest specificity and positive predictive value at 1, whereas percentage weight lost in last month had better overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 0.5833, 0.9444, 0.875, and 0.7727, respectively. The Pearsons correlation coefficient between scored PG-SGA and percentage weight lost in last 1 month was 0.784, highest among all the parameters. Conclusion: 88.33% of gynecologic cancer cases had some degree of malnutrition or were at risk of malnutrition. Approximate percentage weight lost in last 1 month, that is, >= 5% may be used in place of the comprehensive scored PG-SGA to triage the patients in case the latter is not used for some reason. Severe hypoalbuminemia % 2 g/dl is an indicator of severe malnutrition in gynecologic cancer cases.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 42
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[21]   Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology [J].
Ottery, FD .
NUTRITION, 1996, 12 (01) :S15-S19
[22]   Prognostic factors among cancer patients with good performance status screened for phase I trials [J].
Penel, Nicolas ;
Vanseymortier, Marie ;
Bonneterre, Marie-Edith ;
Clisant, Stephanie ;
Dansin, Eric ;
Vendel, Yvette ;
Beuscart, Regis ;
Bonneterre, Jacques .
INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 2008, 26 (01) :53-58
[23]   NONCIRRHOTIC PORTAL FIBROSIS [J].
SAMA, SK ;
BHARGAVA, S ;
GOPINATH, N ;
TALWAR, JR ;
NAYAK, NC ;
TANDON, BN ;
WIG, KL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1971, 51 (02) :160-&
[24]   The views and practice of oncologists towards nutritional support in patients receiving chemotherapy [J].
Spiro, A. ;
Baldwin, C. ;
Patterson, A. ;
Thomas, J. ;
Andreyev, H. J. N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 95 (04) :431-434
[25]   Predicting survival in cancer patients: the role of cachexia and hormonal, nutritional and inflammatory markers [J].
Utech, Anne E. ;
Tadros, Eiriny M. ;
Hayes, Teresa G. ;
Garcia, Jose M. .
JOURNAL OF CACHEXIA SARCOPENIA AND MUSCLE, 2012, 3 (04) :245-251
[26]  
Vandewoude M F J, 2010, Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr, V41, P214, DOI 10.1007/BF03096213
[27]  
World Health Organization, 2001, HAEM CONC DIAGN AN A
[28]  
Zorlini R, 2008, NUTR HOSP, V23, P577