CM-CSF INSTEAD OF HEMATOLOGICAL SUPPORT DURING HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY FOR REFRACTORY MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMA

被引:8
作者
AVILES, A
NAMBO, MJ
TALAVERA, A
ROSAS, A
GARCIA, EL
DIAZMAQUEO, JC
机构
[1] Department of Hematology, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center Mexico, DF
关键词
MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA; NON-HODGKINS LYMPHOMA; GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.3109/10428199509056839
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Patients with refractory malignant lymphoma (RML) have a poor prognosis when treated with conventional chemotherapy. The use of high-dose chemotherapy has been limited by secondary myelosuppression. We report the use of intensive and short-duration chemotherapy in patients with RML who received granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) instead of hematological support and salvage with bone marrow transplantation or infusion of peripheral blood stem cells. Thirty-one patients with RML were treated with cyclophosphamide: 7 g/m(2), iv on day 1, followed by GM-CSF: 5 mu g/kg/day, subcutaneously until hematological recovery (granulocytes > 1.8 x 10(9)/L) started on day 2. Methotrexate, 5 g/m(2), was also given when the granulocytes and platelets counts were normal, followed by leucovorin rescue. Epirubicin, 180 mg/m(2), iv, was given on day 29 if the granulocyte count was normal, and GM-CSF was started on day 30. Complete response was obtained in 21 out of 31 patients (67%) and partial response in 4 more, thus an overall response was achieved in 80% of the treated patients. Time to treatment failure was 24+ months, and the overall survival was 28+ months. Hematological toxicity grade IV, according to the WHO criteria was observed in all cycles, however hematological recovery was already evident on day 13 +/- 2. Eleven patients developed infection related to the treatment, but no therapy related death was observed. GM-CSF was well tolerated with minimal toxicity. Is evident that GM-CSF can act as hematological support after high-dose chemotherapy in patients who cannot undergo bone marrow transplantation programs. We feel that the use of colony-stimulating factors instead of bone marrow support should be explored in more controlled clinical trials and that high-dose chemotherapy should be considered as primary treatment in patients with poor prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 330
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]  
Aviles A., Delgado S., Nambo M.J., Alatriste S., Diaz-Maqueo J.C., Adjuvant radiotherapy to sites of previous bulky disease in patients with stage IV diffuse large cell lymphoma, Intern. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., (1994)
[12]  
Wilson W.H., Bryant G., Bates S., Et al., EPOCH chemotherapy: Toxicity and efficacy in relapsed and refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, J. Clin. Oncol., 11, pp. 1573-1582, (1993)
[13]  
Klump T.R., Mangan L., Glenn D.R., Et al., Phase I/II study of high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin followed by autologous bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with poor prognosis Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, Bone Marrow Transplant., 12, pp. 337-345, (1993)
[14]  
Vose J.M., Anderson J.R., Kessinger A., Et al., High dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, J. Clin. Oncol., 11, pp. 1846-1855, (1993)
[15]  
Laporte J.P., Fouillard L., Dovay L., Et al., GM-CSF instead of autologous bone marrow transplantation after BEAM regimen, Lancet, 338, pp. 601-602, (1991)