AN EVALUATION OF GENERIC SCREENS FOR POOR QUALITY OF HOSPITAL-CARE ON A GENERAL MEDICINE SERVICE

被引:44
作者
HAYWARD, RA
BERNARD, AM
ROSEVEAR, JS
ANDERSON, JE
MCMAHON, LF
机构
[1] UNIV MICHIGAN,DIV GEN MED,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[2] UNIV MICHIGAN,DEPT HLTH SERV MANAGEMENT & POLICY,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
[3] UNIV MICHIGAN,SCH NURSING,ANN ARBOR,MI 48109
关键词
QUALITY OF CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE; HOSPITAL SERVICES; INTERNAL MEDICINE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1097/00005650-199305000-00002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, 675 general medicine admissions at a university teaching hospital were reviewed to evaluate six potential generic quality screens: 1) in-hospital death; 2) 28-day early readmission; 3) low patient satisfaction; 4) worsening severity of illness (as determined by an increase in Laboratory Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation APACHE-L ); and 5) deviations from expected hospital length of stay; and 6) expected ancillary resource use. The quality of care for a stratified random sample of admissions were evaluated using structured implicit review (inter-rater reliability, Kappa=0.5). Patients who died in-hospital were substantially more likely than those who were discharged alive to be rated as having had substandard care (30% vs. 10%; P<0.001). In contrast, cases who had subsequent early readmissions did not have poorer quality ratings. Similarly, lower patient satisfaction was not associated with poorer ratings of technical process of care. Cases with lower-than-expected ancillary resource use (case-mix adjusted for diagnosis-related group) were more likely to be rated as having received substandard care than those with higher-than-expected resource use (16% vs. 6%; P<0.05), and there was a similar trend for cases with shorter than expected length of stays. Associations between worsening severity of illness, as determined by APACHE-L scores, and quality were confounded because such patients were more likely to have died in-hospital. When deaths were excluded from the analysis, we found no association between increases in APACHE-L scores during the hospital course and quality of care. It was found that in-hospital death and lower-than-expected ancillary resource use were associated with poorer implicit quality ratings, but that early readmission, lower patient satisfaction, and increases in APACHE-L scores were not. Quality screens, such as early readmissions, should be critically evaluated before being used administratively.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 402
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   APACHE-L - A NEW SEVERITY OF ILLNESS ADJUSTER FOR INPATIENT MEDICAL-CARE [J].
MCMAHON, LF ;
HAYWARD, RA ;
BERNARD, AM ;
ROSEVEAR, JS ;
WEISSFELD, LA .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (05) :445-452
[12]   THE INTEGRATED INPATIENT MANAGEMENT MODEL - A NEW APPROACH TO CLINICAL-PRACTICE [J].
MCMAHON, LF ;
CREIGHTON, FA ;
BERNARD, AM ;
PITTINGER, WB ;
KELLEY, WN .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (04) :318-326
[13]  
Nunnally J. C., 1967, PSYCHOMETRIC THEORY, V226
[14]   CHANGES IN QUALITY OF CARE FOR 5 DISEASES MEASURED BY IMPLICIT REVIEW, 1981 TO 1986 [J].
RUBENSTEIN, LV ;
KAHN, KL ;
REINISCH, EJ ;
SHERWOOD, MJ ;
ROGERS, WH ;
KAMBERG, C ;
DRAPER, D ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1990, 264 (15) :1974-1979
[15]  
RUBIN HR, 1990, GUIDELINES STRUCTURE