CTENOPHORA IN THE ARCTIC - THE ABUNDANCE, DISTRIBUTION AND PREDATORY IMPACT OF THE CYDIPPID CTENOPHORE MERTENSIA-OVUM (FABRICIUS) IN THE BARENTS SEA

被引:33
作者
SWANBERG, N
BAMSTEDT, U
机构
[1] Department of Fisheries and Marine Biology, High Technology Centre, University of Bergen, Bergen
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1751-8369.1991.tb00669.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The Ctenophora Mertensia ovum and Beroe cucumis, collected using both conventional sampling gear and scuba divers, were studied in the Barents Sea east of Bjornoya and North Norway in spring 1987 and summer 1988. Among the gelatinous zooplankton, Mertensia ovum was the most consistently abundant copepod predator. Feeding experiments were conducted to evaluate the predation rate of M. ovum in various trophic regimes. This ctenophore can take prey varying in size from small copepods to amphipods and krill, but gut-content analyses from field-collected specimens as well as experimental results showed that the main food source for adults was large-sized copepods (e.g. Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis, C. hyperboreus. Metridia longa). The robust tentacle arrray of M, ovum makes this species effective as a predator on large prey. The high potential predation rate of this ctenophore relative to its estimated metabolic cost of only 1.7% of thc body energy content d-1 suggests that M. ovum may be able to maintain a positive energy balance even in conditions of low prey abundance. It is suggested that a single exploitation of a zooplankton patch may provide energy for survival for a very long time. The potential impact of M. ovum on Barents Sea copepod populations is estimated on the basis of the minimal observed average daily ration in experiments and from field data on gut contents. Using abundances of copepods for the area, and the actual predator biomass collected, it was estimated that an average of 0.7% of the copepod fauna per day could fall prey to this predator.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 524
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]  
Larson R.J., Daily ration and predation by medusae and ctenophores in Saanich Inlet, B.C., Canada., Neth. J. Sea Res., 21, pp. 35-44, (1987)
[32]  
Larson R.J., Harbison G.R., Source and fate of lipids in polar gelatinous zooplankton., Arctic, 42, pp. 339-346, (1989)
[33]  
Loeng H.A., Hassel A., Rey F., Skjoldal H.-R., (1985)
[34]  
Madin L.P., Feeding behavior of tentaculate predators: In situ observations and a conceptual model., Bull. Mar. Sci., 43, pp. 413-429, (1988)
[35]  
Madin L.P., Swanberg N.R., In situ methods for the study of planktonic organisms. Pp. 4‐16, Divers, Submersibles and Marine Science, (1984)
[36]  
Matthews J.B.L., Hestad L., Ecological studies on the deep‐water pelagic community of Korsfjorden, western Norway. Length/weight relationships for some macroplank‐tonic organisms., Sarsia, 63, pp. 57-63, (1977)
[37]  
Mortensen T., Ctenophora., Danish Ingolf Expedition, 5, pp. 1-95, (1912)
[38]  
Norrbin F., Batedt U., Energy contents in benthic and planktonic invertebrates of Kosterfjorden, Sweden. A comparison of energetic strategies in marine organism groups., Ophelia, 23, pp. 47-64, (1984)
[39]  
Paffenhofer G.-A., Harris R.P., Laboratory culture of marine holozooplankton and its contribution to studies of marine planktonic foods webs., Adv. Mar. Biol., 16, pp. 211-308, (1979)
[40]  
Percy J.A., Influence of season, size, and temperature on the metabolism of an arctic cydippid ctenophore, Mertensia ovum (Fabricius)., Sarsia, 73, pp. 61-70, (1988)