STANDARD TREATMENT OF MULTIPLE-MYELOMA

被引:31
作者
OKEN, MM
机构
[1] Virginia Piper Cancer Institute, Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0025-6196(12)61100-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the available standard treatment regimens for multiple myeloma. Design: Studies from the literature were summarized, and the efficacy of various chemotherapeutic regimens for induction, maintenance, and relapse therapy was assessed. Results: For many years, standard therapy for multiple myeloma has been intermittent cycles of melphalan + prednisone (MP). Although administration is easy and clinical responses are frequently good, treatment failure usually occurs in less than 2 years, and the 5-year survival is low. The combination regimens of vincristine sulfate, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), melphalan, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone (VBMCP) and two that feature 3-week cycles of melphalan and cyclophosphamide alternating with BCNU and Adriamycin (doxorubicin hydrochloride), either with (VMCP/VBAP) or without (ABCM) vincristine and prednisone, reportedly yield more frequent and durable responses and a higher 5-year survival than MP. Although a metaanalysis of 18 published trials found no overall difference in efficacy between MP and combination chemotherapy, the end point analyzed was only 2-year survival, and the studies were possibly too heterogeneous to afford valid comparisons. Currently; the high response rates, improved duration of disease control, and generally good toxicity profile of VBMCP, ABCM, and VMCP/VBAP make them the preferred primary treatment in patients who can tolerate more intensive therapy than MP. Elderly patients who are bedridden may have difficulty with VBMCP and related regimens and should receive MP instead. Promising results have been obtained with alternating cycles of VBMCP and recombinant interferon-alpha. As maintenance therapy, interferon has delayed relapse, whereas MP has consistently been ineffective. In patients with relapses after unmaintained responses to VBMCP, reinduction therapy with the same regimen can yield a 1-year response. Conclusion: Although the issue is still unresolved, data suggest that combination chemotherapies are superior to MP for treating multiple myeloma.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 786
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   INITIAL TREATMENT IN MULTIPLE-MYELOMA - NO ADVANTAGE OF MULTIDRUG CHEMOTHERAPY OVER MELPHALAN - PREDNISONE [J].
HJORTH, M ;
HELLQUIST, L ;
HOLMBERG, E ;
MAGNUSSON, B ;
RODJER, S ;
WESTIN, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 1990, 74 (02) :185-191
[22]  
LENHARD RE, 1984, CANCER, V53, P1456, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19840401)53:7<1456::AID-CNCR2820530705>3.0.CO
[23]  
2-C
[24]   RESULTS OF THE MRC MYELOMATOSIS TRIALS FOR PATIENTS ENTERED SINCE 1980 [J].
MACLENNAN, ICM ;
KELLY, K ;
CROCKSON, RA ;
COOPER, EH ;
CUZICK, J ;
CHAPMAN, C .
HEMATOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1988, 6 (02) :145-158
[25]   COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY WITH ABCM VERSUS MELPHALAN FOR TREATMENT OF MYELOMATOSIS [J].
MACLENNAN, ICM ;
CHAPMAN, C ;
DUNN, J ;
KELLY, K .
LANCET, 1992, 339 (8787) :200-205
[26]   MAINTENANCE TREATMENT WITH RECOMBINANT INTERFERON ALFA-2B IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-MYELOMA RESPONDING TO CONVENTIONAL INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
MANDELLI, F ;
AVVISATI, G ;
AMADORI, S ;
BOCCADORO, M ;
GERNONE, A ;
LAUTA, VM ;
MARMONT, F ;
PETRUCCI, MT ;
TRIBALTO, M ;
VEGNA, ML ;
DAMMACCO, F ;
PILERI, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1990, 322 (20) :1430-1434
[27]  
MELLSTEDT H, 1979, LANCET, V1, P245
[28]  
Oken M M, 1990, Leuk Lymphoma, V1, P95, DOI 10.3109/10428199009042465
[29]   MULTIPLE-MYELOMA [J].
OKEN, MM .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1984, 68 (03) :757-787
[30]  
OKEN MM, 1990, CLIN IMMUNOL NEWSL, V10, P86