GENETIC-CONTROL OF IMMUNE-RESPONSES TO THE 18-KDA PROTEIN OF MYCOBACTERIUM-LEPRAE - DIFFERENT T(H)1 SUBSETS MAY BE INVOLVED IN PROLIFERATIVE AND DELAYED-TYPE HYPERSENSITIVITY RESPONSES

被引:5
作者
BACKSTROM, BT
HARRIS, DP
PRESTIDGE, RL
WATSON, JD
机构
[1] Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Auckland, Auckland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0008-8749(92)90288-Z
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
In vitro and in vivo responses to the 18-kDa protein of Mycobacterium leprae have been analysed in different strains of mice. Lymphocytes from BALB/cJ (H-2d), BALB.B (H-2b), B10.BR (H-2k), and B10.M (H-2f) mice primed with 18-kDa protein yielded high T cell proliferative responses, while those from C57BL/10J (H-2b) mice yielded lower responses. Both H-2 and non-H-2 genes contributed to the magnitude of responsiveness. F1 mice from high and low responder strains showed high responsiveness to the 18-kDa protein. Supernatants from lymph node cell cultures prepared from 18-kDa protein-immunised BALB/cJ, B10.BR, and C57BL/10J mice contained IL-2 but no IL-4, indicating that activated T cells from both high and low responder mice were of a TH1 phenotype. Cell cultures from low responder C57BL/10J mice produced less IL-2 than those from high responders. The low responsiveness to the 18-kDa protein in proliferative assays might be due to a low frequency of antigen-specific T cells in the C57BL/10J mouse strain. BALB/cJ, C57BL/10J, and F1 (BALB/cJ X B10.BR) mouse strains were tested for in vivo DTH reactions to the 18-kDa protein. All strains, including C57BL/10J, were high DTH responders. Although DTH effector cells and 18-kDa protein-specific proliferative T cells belong to the TH1 subset, our data comparing high and low responder status indicate that distinct TH1 subpopulations are stimulated in response to the 18-kDa protein of M. leprae. © 1992.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 274
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [11] ENGERS HD, 1985, INFECT IMMUN, V48, P603
  • [12] GAJEWSKI TF, 1989, J IMMUNOL, V143, P15
  • [13] REGULATION OF T-CELL ACTIVATION - DIFFERENCES AMONG T-CELL SUBSETS
    GAJEWSKI, TF
    SCHELL, SR
    NAU, G
    FITCH, FW
    [J]. IMMUNOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1989, 111 : 79 - 110
  • [14] Godal T, 1978, Prog Allergy, V25, P211, DOI 10.1159/000314445
  • [15] GRAY DF, 1955, AM REV TUBERC PULM, V72, P171
  • [16] HARRIS DP, 1989, J IMMUNOL, V143, P2006
  • [17] ANTIGEN-SPECIFIC INTERACTION BETWEEN T-CELLS AND B-CELLS
    LANZAVECCHIA, A
    [J]. NATURE, 1985, 314 (6011) : 537 - 539
  • [18] T-CELL AND MAST-CELL LINES RESPOND TO B-CELL STIMULATORY FACTOR-I
    MOSMANN, TR
    BOND, MW
    COFFMAN, RL
    OHARA, J
    PAUL, WE
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1986, 83 (15) : 5654 - 5658
  • [19] HETEROGENEITY OF CYTOKINE SECRETION PATTERNS AND FUNCTIONS OF HELPER T-CELLS
    MOSMANN, TR
    COFFMAN, RL
    [J]. ADVANCES IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 46 : 111 - 147
  • [20] MOSMANN TR, 1986, J IMMUNOL, V136, P2348