Knowledge discovery from post-project reviews

被引:31
作者
Carrillo, Patricia [1 ]
Harding, Jenny [2 ]
Choudhary, Alok [3 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Dept Civil & Bldg Engn, Ashby Rd, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
[2] Loughborough Univ, Wolfson Sch, Loughborough, Leics, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Sheffield S1 4DT, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Knowledge discovery; text mining; project reviews; knowledge;
D O I
10.1080/01446193.2011.588953
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Many construction companies conduct reviews on project completion to enhance learning and to fulfil quality management procedures. Often these reports are filed away never to be seen again. This means that potentially important knowledge that may assist other project teams is not exploited. In order to ascertain whether useful knowledge can be gleaned from such reports, Knowledge Discovery from Text (KDT) and text mining (TM) are applied. Text mining avoids the need for a manual search through a vast number of reports, potentially of different formats and foci, to seek trends that may be useful for current and future projects. Pilot tests were used to analyse 48 post-project review reports. The reports were first reviewed manually to identify key themes. They were then analysed using text mining software to investigate whether text mining could identify trends and uncover useful knowledge from the reports. Pilot tests succeeded in finding common occurrences across different projects that were previously unknown. Text mining could provide a potential solution and would aid project teams to learn from previous projects. However, a lot of work is currently required before the text mining tests are conducted and the results need to be examined carefully by those with domain knowledge to validate the results obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:713 / 723
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ARGYRIS C, 1977, HARVARD BUS REV, V55, P115
[2]   Learning from action:: Imbedding more learning into the performance fast enough to make a difference [J].
Baird, L ;
Holland, P ;
Deacon, S .
ORGANIZATIONAL DYNAMICS, 1999, 27 (04) :19-32
[3]  
Busby J.S., 1999, J APPL BEHAV SCI, V35, P109, DOI [10.1177/0021886399351009, DOI 10.1177/0021886399351009]
[4]   Automating hierarchical document classification for construction management information systems [J].
Caldas, CH ;
Soibelman, L .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2003, 12 (04) :395-406
[5]   Automated classification of construction project documents [J].
Caldas, CH ;
Soibelman, L ;
Han, JW .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2002, 16 (04) :234-243
[6]  
Carrillo P., 2004, PROJECT MANAGE J, V35, P46, DOI [10.1177/875697280403500105, DOI 10.1177/875697280403500105]
[7]   Lessons learned practices in the engineering, procurement and construction sector [J].
Carrillo, Patricia .
ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 12 (03) :236-+
[8]  
Construction Industry Institute, 2007, EFF MAN PRACT TECHN
[9]  
Cross Industry Standard Process for Data Mining, 2010, PROC MOD
[10]  
David Bartholomew Associates, 2003, LEARNING EXPERIENCE