METHODS FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS DETERMINED FROM THE DISTRIBUTION OF DNA FRAGMENT SIZES MEASURED BY PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS

被引:83
作者
CEDERVALL, B
WONG, R
ALBRIGHT, N
DYNLACHT, J
LAMBIN, P
DEWEY, WC
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO, RADIAT ONCOL RES LAB, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 USA
[2] INST GUSTAVE ROUSSY, RADIOBIOL CELLULAIRE LAB, F-94805 VILLEJUIF, FRANCE
[3] UNIV ZIEKENHUIS GASTHUISBERG, B-3000 LOUVAIN, BELGIUM
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3578920
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Different methods were used for evaluating data for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), as obtained by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) after X irradiation of Chinese hamster ovary cells. A total of 60 data points in the dose range of 0 to 116 Gy, along with repair data for 30 and 60 Gy, were analyzed by four methods: (1) percentage of DNA released from the plug, (2) specific size markers (percentage of DNA less than specific sizes), (3) fragment size distributions and (4) shape of the molecular weight (M) distributions. With the last method, both the slope and the intercept of the logarithm of the amount of radioactive DNA/Delta M/M plotted as a function of M were used for calculating DSBs/100 Mbp. The slope and the intercept analyses differ in that the former is relatively independent of DNA trapped in the agarose plugs, i.e. cannot be released by doses of 100-150 Gy, whereas the intercept is dependent on the percentage of DNA trapped. Also, calculations of DSBs/100 Mbp for methods 1, 2 and 3 depend on the amount of DNA trapped in the plug, However, the slope method is unreliable for doses below about 20 Gy, and the scatter of data points is much greater than that obtained by the intercept method and by methods 1, 2 and 3. Therefore, the fragment size distribution and the specific size marker methods give the most consistent results, with 0.49 +/- 0.03 (95% CI) (DSBs/100 Mbp)/Gy. With the specific size marker method, however, care must be taken in selection of size markers in relation to the levels of DSBs of interest. Assuming randomly distributed DSBs, all four methods gave essentially the same results; i.e., the dose response was linear with a calculated level of 0.5-0.6 (DSBs/100 Mbp)/Gy, which is the same as 0.47-0.62 determined previously by calibrating with (125)IdU. (C) 1995 by Radiation Research Society
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 16
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   CALIBRATION OF PULSED FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS FOR MEASUREMENT OF DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS [J].
AGER, DD ;
DEWEY, WC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1990, 58 (02) :249-259
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION-INDUCED DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS BY PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS [J].
AGER, DD ;
DEWEY, WC ;
GARDINER, K ;
HARVEY, W ;
JOHNSON, RT ;
WALDREN, CA .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1990, 122 (02) :181-187
[3]   IN CHEF ELECTROPHORESIS A LINEAR INDUCTION OF DSB CORRESPONDS TO A NONLINEAR FRACTION OF EXTRACTED DNA WITH DOSE [J].
BLOCHER, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1990, 57 (01) :7-12
[5]   RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS AS MEASURED BY PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS - A SERIES OF EXPLANATORY CALCULATIONS [J].
CEDERVALL, B ;
KALLMAN, P .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 1994, 33 (01) :9-21
[6]   REPAIR OF DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS - ERRORS ENCOUNTERED IN THE DETERMINATION OF HALF-LIFE TIMES IN PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS AND NEUTRAL FILTER ELUTION [J].
CEDERVALL, B ;
KALLMAN, P ;
DEWEY, WC .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 1995, 142 (01) :23-28
[7]  
CEDERVALL B, 1991, RAD RES 20TH CENTURY, V1, P406
[8]   GEL FORMATION AND MOLECULAR WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION IN LONG-CHAIN POLYMERS [J].
CHARLESBY, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1954, 222 (1151) :542-557
[9]   ANALYSIS OF DNA DOUBLE STRAND BREAKAGE AND REPAIR USING ORTHOGONAL FIELD ALTERNATION GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS [J].
CONTOPOULOU, CR ;
COOK, VE ;
MORTIMER, RK .
YEAST, 1987, 3 (02) :71-76
[10]   A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAK INDUCTION FREQUENCY IN MAMMALIAN-CELLS BY PULSED-FIELD GEL-ELECTROPHORESIS [J].
DEALMODOVAR, JMR ;
STEEL, GG ;
WHITAKER, SJ ;
MCMILLAN, TJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1994, 65 (06) :641-649