The purpose, design and administration of a questionnaire for data collection

被引:66
作者
Marshall, Gill [1 ]
机构
[1] St Martins Coll, Div Med Imaging Sci, Lancaster LA1 3JD, England
关键词
Reliability; Validity; Piloting; Approval; Question types;
D O I
10.1016/j.radi.2004.09.002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
This paper considers the use of questionnaires as a data collection tool. A range of issues will be discussed, including whether previously validated questionnaires already exist for utilisation, the advantages and disadvantages of employing questionnaires, optimum design features including the wording and language used and the ordering of questions, distribution methods, ways of maximizing response rates and managing non-responses, reliability and validity, the benefits of piloting the questionnaire and approval before the questionnaire is used. Questionnaire-based research is increasing evident within the NHS and elsewhere and from this presentation it is clear that a range of issues must be taken into account so that collected data can be gathered effectively in a format that can be appropriately used. (C) 2004 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 136
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Greenhalgh T, 2001, HOW TO READ A PAPER, P45
[12]   A comparison of a Patient Enablement instrument (PEI) against two established satisfaction scales as an outcome measure of primary care consultations [J].
Howie, JGR ;
Heaney, DJ ;
Maxwell, M ;
Walker, JJ .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 1998, 15 (02) :165-171
[13]  
Jack B, 1998, Prof Nurse, V14, P176
[14]  
McColl E, 1993, NURSE RES, V1, P16
[15]  
NEWELL R, 1993, NURSE RES, V1, P33
[16]  
Oppenheim A., 1992, QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN, P49
[17]  
Parahoo K, 1993, NURSE RES, V1, P4
[18]  
Polgar S, 1995, INTRO RES HLTH SCI, P243
[19]  
Polit D, 1999, NURSING RES PRINCIPL, P201
[20]   Assessment tools for general health care settings: PRIME-MD, OARS, and SF-36 [J].
VanHook, MP ;
Berkman, B ;
Dunkle, R .
HEALTH & SOCIAL WORK, 1996, 21 (03) :230-234