VARIABILITY OF MOTOR POTENTIALS-EVOKED BY TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION

被引:363
作者
KIERS, L [1 ]
CROS, D [1 ]
CHIAPPA, KH [1 ]
FANG, J [1 ]
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL LABS, EMG LAB, BIGELOW 12, BOSTON, MA 02114 USA
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1993年 / 89卷 / 06期
关键词
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; VARIABILITY; STIMULUS INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/0168-5597(93)90115-6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We studied the effect of stimulus intensity, coil size, mental alertness and prestimulus muscle contraction on the variability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by magnetic cortical stimulation (MCS). In 5 healthy subjects we delivered MCS either with a circular coil centered at the vertex or a figure-8 coil centered over the motor cortex hand area, recording from first dorsal interosseous. With the subject at rest or exerting 5% maximum voluntary contraction, 30 consecutive stimuli were given at 4 stimulus intensities (SIs) in 10% increments above resting motor threshold. Concurrent mental arithmetic constituted mental alertness. Spectral analysis was performed on data from 300 consecutive stimuli. The variability of MEP response size was inversely related to stimulus intensity, prestimulus voluntary muscle contraction, the recruitment of motoneurons and the size of the field generated by the magnetic coil. The MEP variability was larger than and not correlated with the variability of the H-reflex. Fast Fourier transformation and cross-correlation analysis did not identify a consistent dominant frequency, suggesting that the variability in MEP size is essentially random. We suggest that the variability in MEP response is caused by constant, rapid, spontaneous fluctuations in corticospinal and segmental motoneuron excitability levels. Any maneuver that raises this level or increases the probability of motoneuron firing will decrease MEP variability.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 423
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Impulses in the pyramidal tract
    Adrian, ED
    Moruzzi, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1939, 97 (02): : 153 - 199
  • [2] AMASSIAN VE, 1988, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V403, pP75
  • [3] FOCAL STIMULATION OF HUMAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX WITH THE MAGNETIC COIL - A COMPARISON WITH ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION
    AMASSIAN, VE
    CRACCO, RQ
    MACCABEE, PJ
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1989, 74 (06): : 401 - 416
  • [4] RESPONSES OF SINGLE SPINAL MOTONEURONS TO MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS AND PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    BONIFACE, SJ
    MILLS, KR
    SCHUBERT, M
    [J]. BRAIN, 1991, 114 : 643 - 662
  • [5] TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX WITH MAGNETIC STIMULATION - FACTORS AFFECTING ACCURACY AND REPRODUCIBILITY
    BRASILNETO, JP
    MCSHANE, LM
    FUHR, P
    HALLETT, M
    COHEN, LG
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (01): : 9 - 16
  • [6] VARIABILITY OF CORTICALLY EVOKED MOTOR-RESPONSES IN MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS
    BRITTON, TC
    MEYER, BU
    BENECKE, R
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 81 (03): : 186 - 194
  • [7] NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE CENTRAL NERVOUS IMPULSE PROPAGATION IN PATIENTS WITH SENSORIMOTOR DISTURBANCES
    CARAMIA, MD
    BERNARDI, G
    ZAROLA, F
    ROSSINI, PM
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1988, 70 (01): : 16 - 25
  • [8] MAGNETIC STIMULATION - DETERMINATION OF COIL CURRENT FLOW DIRECTION
    CHIAPPA, KH
    CROS, D
    COHEN, D
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 1991, 41 (07) : 1154 - 1155
  • [9] CHOKROVERTY S, 1991, NEUROLOGY S1, V40, P285
  • [10] DAY B J, 1991, Neurology, V41, P427