ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT OF DRUGS IN SPAIN

被引:5
作者
BADIA, X
ROVIRA, J
SEGU, JL
PORTA, M
机构
[1] Institut D’Estudis de la Salut (IES), Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona
[2] Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute Municipal D’Investigació Médica (Lm1M), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, E-08003
[3] Soikos, Centre of Health Economics and Social Policy, Barcelona
[4] Servei Català de la Salut, Divisió D’Atenció Farmacèutica, Barcelona
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199405020-00006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In order to assess the characteristics and influence on healthcare decision making of the economic assessment of drugs in Spain, pharmacoeconomic studies carried out between 1982 and 1992 were examined. We identified and analysed 16 pharmacoeconomic studies. The commonest type of economic assessment was cost-effectiveness analysis. Only one study included measures of health-related quality of life. Only one study was carried out in conjunction with a controlled clinical trial. Evidence of influence on decision making was found in 6 studies. Two studies implemented hepatitis vaccination programmes, one set up a telephone follow-up of antituberculosis chemoprophylaxis, one developed the official procedures for using epoetin (recombinant human erythropoietin), one initiated clinical discussion meetings about the cost effectiveness of cholesterol-lowering therapy, and one strengthened the decision to register nebacumab (HA-1A, Centoxin), the monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. The quality of the studies was acceptable according to generally agreed checklists, although somewhat lower than those in other countries with longer traditions in this field. Improvement of the scientific quality of the studies and an increased use of the results for decision making need to be promoted. At present the number of studies of economic assessment of drugs in Spain is low, as is the influence of these studies on healthcare decision making. The movement of the Spanish healthcare authorities towards a selective drugs funding policy is likely to increase the number of studies and their impact on healthcare decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]  
Drommond M., Runen F., Brenna A., Pinto C.G., Horisberger B., Et al., Economic evaluation of pharmaceutical: a European perspective, Pharmaco Economics, 4, pp. 173-186, (1993)
[22]  
Feeny O., Labelle R., Torrance G.W., Integrating economic evaluations and quality of life assessment, In Spilker (Ed.) Quality of life assessment in clinical trials, pp. 78-83, (1990)
[23]  
Fernandez J., Oclgado M., Coste-beneficio de una campana hospitalaria de vacunaciOn anti-hepatitis B, Laboratorio, 16, pp. 565-583, (1983)
[24]  
Freund D., DiituS R., Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapy, Pharmaco Economics, 1, pp. 20-32, (1992)
[25]  
Garcia A., Rovira J., Analisis cOstte-efectividad de dos alternativas de tratamiento del tabaquismo, In X Jornadas Españolas de Economia de la Salud, Pamplona, pp. 1-9, (1990)
[26]  
Gueh J., To J., Pales A., Analisis medico-econOmico de la profilaxis antitrombotica versus no-profilaxis en traumatologia:estudio de 290 casos, Angiologia, 39, pp. 1-8, (1987)
[27]  
Haaijer-Ruskamp F.M., Dukes M.N.G., Drugs and money: the problem of cost containment, pp. 3-13, (1991)
[28]  
Hillman A.L., Eisenberg J.M., Pauly M.Y., Bloom B.S., Glick H., Et al., Avoiding bias in the conduct and reporting of cost,effectiveness researeh sponsored by pharmaceutical company, New England Journal of medicine, 324, pp. 1362-1365, (1991)
[29]  
Laporte J.R., Poru M., Capella D., Arnau J.M., Drugs in the Spanish health system, International Journal of Health Services, 14, pp. 635-648, (1984)
[30]  
Lobo A., Perez-Echevarria M.J., Artal J., Validity of the scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), in a Spanissh population Psychological Medicine, 16, pp. 135-140, (1986)