VALUE OF THE PROSPECTIVE BEFORE AND AFTER STUDY AS A METHODOLOGY TO EVALUATE OUTCOME IN A TRAUMA CENTER

被引:10
作者
HILL, DA
WEST, RH
DUFLOU, J
机构
来源
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 1993年 / 63卷 / 12期
关键词
OUTCOME EVALUATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; TRAUMA CENTERS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-2197.1993.tb01723.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
A series of interventions (administrative, clinical and educational) was introduced to improve the quality of trauma care at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, the designated trauma centre for the Central Sydney Area Health Service (CSAHS). A prospective, 'before and after' study was conducted to assess changes in outcome following the introduction of these measures. The trauma centre survival rate for patients admitted with serious injury (Injury Severity Scores > 15) increased significantly, from 72% in the nine months before trauma centre designation to 89% in the nine months after (P=0.005). The peer review designated, potentially avoidable death rate did not change significantly over the two study periods, remaining in the 20-30% range. Similarly the unexpected death rate (TRISS) did not change significantly, remaining in the 20-45% range. A trend to a lower trauma centre mortality in those arriving with a systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mmHg was noted. Seven out of 14 patients 'at risk' from exsanguination died in the first 9 months compared with one out of seven in the second 9 months (P = 0.17). An unexpected finding was a change in the degree of injury severity and physiological status in patients arriving at the trauma centre. The Injury Severity Scores were significantly lower (P=0.008) and the Revised Trauma Scores significantly higher (P=0.0006) in the latter 9 months of the study. It was concluded that the improved trauma centre survival rate was a reflection of a reduced hospital mortality from haemorrhagic shock in conjunction with a lesser degree of injury severity in patients admitted from the CSAHS.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 945
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]  
Guss D.A., Meyer F.T., Neuman T.S., Et al., The impact of a regionalized trauma system on trauma care in San Diego County, Ann. Emerg. Med, 18, pp. 1141-1145, (1989)
[12]  
Kane G., Wheeler N.C., Cook S., Et al., Impact of the Los Angeles County Trauma System on the Survival of Seriously Injured Patients, J. Trauma, 32, pp. 576-583, (1992)
[13]  
Roy P.D., The value of trauma centres: A methodologic review, Can. J. Surg, 30, pp. 17-22, (1987)
[14]  
Trunkey D.D., Trauma, Sci Am, 249, pp. 20-27, (1983)
[15]  
Hill D.A., A model to teach trauma care to medical students, Med Teach, 15, pp. 179-188, (1993)
[16]  
Resources for optimal care of the injured patient, (1990)
[17]  
Phalr I.C., Barnes M.R., Barton D.J., Allen M.J., Deaths follow trauma: An audit of performance, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl, 73, pp. 53-57, (1991)
[18]  
Mackenzie E.J., Steinwachs D.M., Bone L.R., Floccare D.J., Ramzy A.I., Inter‐rater reliability of preventable death judgments, J. Trauma, 33, pp. 292-303, (1992)
[19]  
Karmy-Jomes R., Copes W.S., Champion H.R., Et al., Results of a multi‐institutional outcome assessment: Results of a structured peer review of TRISS‐designated unexpected outcomes, J. Trauma, 32, pp. 196-203, (1992)
[20]  
Hill D.A., Lennox A.F., Neil M.J., Sheehy J.P., Evaluation of TRISS as a means of selecting trauma deaths for clinical peer review, Aust. N.Z. J. Surg, 62, pp. 204-208, (1992)