THE REASONABLENESS OF NONCONSTANT DISCOUNTING

被引:70
作者
HARVEY, CM
机构
[1] Department of Decision and Information Sciences, University of Houston, Houston
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0047-2727(94)90012-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The typical method for valuing the future goods and harms of a public policy alternative is by means of a constant annual discount rate. This paper examines the reasonableness for public policy analysis of non-constant discounting methods that, unlike constant discounting, can accord considerable importance to outcomes in the distant future. We examine temporal consistency and economic efficiency as reasons for the use of constant discounting - and we argue that these reasons do not apply for a public policy choice whose effects are long-range and irreversible.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 51
页数:21
相关论文
共 47 条
[31]  
PFANZAGL J, 1959, NAV RES LOG, V6, P283, DOI DOI 10.1002/NAV.3800060404
[32]  
Pigou A. C., 1924, EC WELFARE
[33]  
POLLAK RA, 1968, REV ECON STUD, V25, P201
[34]   RISK-AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE [J].
PRATT, JW .
ECONOMETRICA, 1964, 32 (1-2) :122-136
[35]  
Prelec Drazen, 1989, DECREASING IMPATIENC
[36]   COMMITMENT, CHOICE AND SELF-CONTROL [J].
RACHLIN, H ;
GREEN, L .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1972, 17 (01) :15-+
[37]  
Rawls J, 1971, THEORY JUSTICE
[38]  
Schelling T. C., 1984, CHOICE CONSEQUENCE
[39]  
SOLNICK JC, 1980, LEARN MOTIV, P61
[40]  
STROTZ RH, 1965, REV ECON STUD, V32, P85