The purpose of this investigation was to examine the utility of EMG force characteristics as reliable and valid parameters by which to assess oral function. Masseter-muscle activity was recorded during controlled isometric biting exercises performed at various bite openings and force levels on two separate occasions. Measured muscle-activity levels, as well as the EMG-force characteristics of slope and y-intercept, were compared between bite openings and experimental trials. Sensitivity, assessed as the ability to detect statistically significant differences in muscle function due to changes in muscle length, was found to be acceptable for all measurements, except the y-intercept parameter, and during production of minimal forces. Reproducibility, evaluated as the correspondence between values recorded at different experimental sessions, was best for the EMG-force parameter of slope and during production of higher forces. The results from this study support the following conclusions: (1) Substantial variations in muscle function exist between individuals; (2) acceptable reliability and sensitivity of quantitative EMG values can be achieved, especially at higher muscle-activity levels, by rigidly controlling and quantifying functional activities during experimental trials; (3) the slope of an EMG-force curve is a reproducible, quantitative, and functionally sensitive measurement for assessment of muscle function; and (4) the EMG-force y-intercept is not a reliable quantity by which muscle-function characteristics may be studied.